Publication:
Surgical Treatment of Acut and Chronic Oroantral Communications: A Clinical Study of 33 Cases

dc.authorscopusid35335969500
dc.authorscopusid13105607600
dc.authorscopusid57202380560
dc.authorscopusid55603101900
dc.authorscopusid55359719400
dc.contributor.authorBereket, C.
dc.contributor.authorŞener, I.
dc.contributor.authorÖzkan, E.
dc.contributor.authorKaynar, M.
dc.contributor.authorŞenel, E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:42:12Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:42:12Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Bereket] Cihan, Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Şener] İsmail, Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Özkan] Enes, Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Kaynar] Mustafa, Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Şenel] Erman, Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractOroantral comunications are known as pathological connections occuring between the oral cavity and maxillary sinus. Early treatment of this condition prevents the development of sinusitis and fistula, as well as the need for more complex methods of treating patients and the possibility of recurrence. In this study; age, sex, etiologic factors, location of the opening, methods of treatment and early complications of 33 patients that surgically treated in Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic between 2005-2011 were examined. 18 (54.54%) of oroantral openings were treated with buccal advancement flap, 4 (12.12%) of them were treated with palatal rotational flap, 8 (24.24%) of them were treated with iodoform gauze pack strip and the remaining 3 (9.09%) cases were treated with buccal fat pad, double-tunnel method and primary closure. In all cases, tooth extraction was the only etiologic factor. 100% (20/20) success was achieved in all patients with acute openings, while the rate was 77% (13/10) in patients with oroantral fistula.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7126/cdj.2012.1610
dc.identifier.endpage49en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-2852
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84874157608
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage40en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.2012.1610
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofCumhuriyet Dental Journalen_US
dc.relation.journalCumhuriyet Dental Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBuccal Advancement Flapen_US
dc.subjectOroantral Fistulaen_US
dc.subjectOroantral Openingen_US
dc.subjectPalatal Flapen_US
dc.titleSurgical Treatment of Acut and Chronic Oroantral Communications: A Clinical Study of 33 Casesen_US
dc.title.alternativeAkut ve Kronik Oroantral Açıklıkların Cerrahi Tedavisi: 33 Vakalık Klinik Çalışmaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files