Publication:
Noninvasive Assessment of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure with Tissue Doppler Imaging in Patients with Mitral Regurgitation

dc.contributor.authorYesildag, Osman
dc.contributor.authorKoprulu, Diyar
dc.contributor.authorYuksel, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorSoylu, Korhan
dc.contributor.authorOzben, Beste
dc.contributor.authorIDYuksel, Serkan/0000-0001-9501-4568
dc.contributor.authorIDOzben, Beste/0000-0002-3484-6392
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:39:53Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:39:53Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.department-temp[Yesildag, Osman -- Ozben, Beste] Marmara Univ Fac Med, Dept Cardiol, Istanbul, Turkey -- [Koprulu, Diyar] Bafra State Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Samsun, Turkey -- [Yuksel, Serkan -- Soylu, Korhan] Ondokuz Mayis Univ Fac Med, Dept Cardiol, Samsun, Turkey --en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The ratio of early transmitral flow velocity to mitral annulus early diastolic velocity (E/Ea) is a widely used noninvasive tool to estimate left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP). The aim of this study was to explore whether E/Ea ratio was a reliable index for the estimation of LVEDP in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR). Methods: Sixteen patients with nonischemic MR (primary MR group; 6 male, 58 +/- 12 years) 51 patients with ischemic MR (secondary MR group; 29 male, 63 +/- 9 years) and 29 patients without MR (control group; 19 male, 53 +/- 10 years) were consecutively included. The peak transmitral flow and mitral annular velocities during early diastole were measured. LVEDP was determined invasively by left heart catheterization. Results: Primary and secondary MR groups had significantly higher E/Ea ratios and LVEDP than control group. LVEDP significantly correlated with E/Ea ratio in patients with primary MR, but not in patients with secondary MR. Multiple regression analysis revealed that E/Ea ratio was an independent predictor of LVEDP in patients with primary MR. Ten patients with primary MR had LVEDP >= 15 mmHg. ROC analysis demonstrated cutoff values for E/Ea ratios as > 10.5 for lateral mitral annulus (sensitivity: 80%, specificity: 66%, PPV: 80%, NPV: 66%) and as > 14 for medial mitral annulus (sensitivity: 90%, specificity: 83%, PPV: 90%, NPV: 83%) to predict primary MR patients with LVEDP >= 15 mmHg. Conclusion: E/Ea ratio is still reliable in estimation of LVEDP in primary MR patients while it is not predictive for LVEDP in secondary MR patients. (Echocardiography 2011;28:633-640)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01393.x
dc.identifier.endpage640en_US
dc.identifier.issn0742-2822
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21718351
dc.identifier.startpage633en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01393.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/17123
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000292887100014
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.relation.journalEchocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniquesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEchocardiographyen_US
dc.subjectLeft Heart Catheterizationen_US
dc.subjectLeft Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressureen_US
dc.subjectMitral Regurgitationen_US
dc.subjectTissue Doppler Imagingen_US
dc.titleNoninvasive Assessment of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure with Tissue Doppler Imaging in Patients with Mitral Regurgitationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files