Publication:
Radiation Exposure of Patients and Staff Working in Angiography and Interventional Radiology Unit

dc.authorscopusid57223229309
dc.authorscopusid8221119200
dc.authorscopusid7007082917
dc.contributor.authorAkan, C.A.
dc.contributor.authorGümüş, H.
dc.contributor.authorAkan, H.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:24:32Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Akan] Cemile Avci, Department of Transport Services, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Gümüş] Hasan, Department of Physics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Akan] Hüseyin, Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis University, Medical School, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractCatheter angiography and interventional radiologic procedures are the medical applications with the highest exposure to radiation. The projection used, in other words the irradiated region of the patient, constantly changes and the change in irradiation geometry due to the movements of the image amplifier is another important factor. Irradiation can be achieved in the form of continuous (fluoroscopic) or sequential static images (filming). In these irradiations the kVp, mA and irradiation time of the system change continuously depending on the patient thickness. The aim of this study was to determine the dose of radiation the staff working in Angiography and Interventional Radiology unit and the patients undergoing intervention were exposed to and to discuss the measures to decrease the dose of radiation. In this study, the dose values of 129 patients and three physicians and two radiotechnologists working in the unit were determined. In order to evaluate the radiation doses of the employees, radiation doses were measured with Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) dosimeters over a period of six months. Doses of the patients during the procedure were measured separately. Total bimonthly and annual dose amounts were determined for the physicians as chest (collar), belt and wrist with the help of OSL dosimeters. Likewise, total bimonthly and annual dose amounts of radiotechnologists were measured as breast (neck) and belt. It was found that the duration of fluoroscopy was 2-3 times higher in radiological procedures than in diagnostic angiography and therefore the patient and radiologist were exposed to more radiation. The exposure radiation dose can be significantly decreased by reducing the number of frames per second during both fluoroscopy and filming. © 2020 OMUen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5835/jecm.omu.37.01.001
dc.identifier.endpage4en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-4483
dc.identifier.issn1309-5129
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85105346406
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5835/jecm.omu.37.01.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/36328
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOndokuz Mayis Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine (Turkey)en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEquivalent Dose Interventional Radiology OSL Dosimeter Radiology Staff X-Raysen_US
dc.titleRadiation Exposure of Patients and Staff Working in Angiography and Interventional Radiology Uniten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files