Publication:
Potential of Three Different Lactic Acid Bacteria to Use as Starter Culture for Production of Type II Sourdough Breadmaking

dc.authorscopusid57206484391
dc.authorscopusid55444242100
dc.authorscopusid6603964170
dc.contributor.authorGül, L.B.
dc.contributor.authorGül, O.
dc.contributor.authorCon, A.H.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:30:16Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Gül] Latife Betül, Department of Food Engineering, Giresun Üniversitesi, Giresun, Giresun, Turkey; [Gül] Osman, Department of Food Engineering, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Kastamonu, Turkey; [Con] Ahmet Hilmi, Department of Food Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe principle objective of this study was to investigate the use of three different lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus curvatus N19, Weissella cibaria N9 and L. brevis ED25) lyophilized with optimum cryoprotective agent formulations as Type II sourdough culture to develop sourdough bread in terms of physicochemical, textural and sensory characteristics as well as volatile aroma compounds. Compared to control sample (fermented only commercial yeast), specific volume, crust and crumb color, and textural properties were markedly more acceptable for sourdough bread. The concentration of lactic (2.12–2.87 g/kg) and acetic (0.43–0.77 g/kg) acids in the sourdough bread was significantly higher compared to control sample (0.28 and 0.09 g/kg, respectively). A total of 57 volatile compounds including 13 alcohols, 9 esters, 8 ketones, 13 aldehydes, 10 acid group components, and 4 other compounds (such as oxidation product amine, terpene, sulfur compounds, organic compounds) were detected. Among these compounds, alcohols and aldehydes were significantly higher in control sample, while the ratio of acids was found to be higher in sourdough breads. The evaluation scores of the sourdough breads had desirable sensory features, but in terms of general acceptance values, it was concluded that those containing L. brevis ED25 was more preferred. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11694-022-01493-0
dc.identifier.endpage4008en_US
dc.identifier.issn2193-4126
dc.identifier.issn2193-4134
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85133158989
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage3998en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-022-01493-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/36891
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Food Measurement and Characterizationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBread Qualityen_US
dc.subjectLactobacillus brevis ED25en_US
dc.subjectLactobacillus curvatus N19en_US
dc.subjectSourdough Breaden_US
dc.subjectVolatile Aroma Compoundsen_US
dc.subjectWeissella cibaria N9en_US
dc.titlePotential of Three Different Lactic Acid Bacteria to Use as Starter Culture for Production of Type II Sourdough Breadmakingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files