Publication:
Surgical Management of Intraocular Lens Dislocations

dc.authorscopusid25723204700
dc.authorscopusid56393872100
dc.authorscopusid55125592200
dc.authorscopusid54401920900
dc.authorscopusid6602733678
dc.contributor.authorGül, A.
dc.contributor.authorDuran, M.
dc.contributor.authorCan, E.
dc.contributor.authorYücel, O.E.
dc.contributor.authorSüllü, Y.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:45:31Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:45:31Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Gül] Adem, Department of Ophthalmology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Duran] Mustafa, Department of Ophthalmology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Can] Ertugrul, Department of Ophthalmology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Yücel] Özlem Eşki, Department of Ophthalmology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Süllü] Ýüksel, Department of Ophthalmology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To report and compare the surgical, visual, and anatomical outcomes following treatment of dislocated intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods: The medical records of 28 eyes of 28 patients were evaluated. Age, gender, pre-and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), surgical methods, and complications were recorded. Results: Pre-and postoperative BCVA ranged from counting fingers to 20/32 and from counting fingers to 20/25, respectively. Late-onset dislocations were the most frequently observed complication. The most frequent surgical method was IOL repositioning in 15 of 28 patients, followed by IOL exchange in 11 patients, and IOL removal in 2 patients. Only 1 patient required surgical re-intervention with IOL capture. Conclusions: Visual acuity improved following the use of either IOL repositioning or IOL exchange. No superiority of one method over the other was observed. In the present retrospective case series, management of dislocated IOLs with repositioning or exchange of the primary implant conferred comparable surgical and visual outcomes.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5935/0004-2749.20150082
dc.identifier.endpage317en_US
dc.identifier.issn0004-2749
dc.identifier.issn1678-2925
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26466232
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84945892690
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage313en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20150082
dc.identifier.volume78en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000363087000011
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherConselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia abo@cbo.com.bren_US
dc.relation.ispartofArquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologiaen_US
dc.relation.journalArquivos Brasileiros De Oftalmologiaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectIntraocular/Methodsen_US
dc.subjectLens Implantationen_US
dc.subjectLenses Intraocularen_US
dc.subjectVisual Acuity/Physiologyen_US
dc.titleSurgical Management of Intraocular Lens Dislocationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files