Publication:
Comparison of Low Level Laser and Arginine-Calcium Carbonate Alone or Combination in the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Split-Mouth Clinical Study

dc.authorscopusid56583786400
dc.authorscopusid14054138800
dc.authorscopusid14528022500
dc.authorscopusid57204485873
dc.authorscopusid56095234800
dc.contributor.authorBal, M.V.
dc.contributor.authorKeskiner, I.
dc.contributor.authorSezer, U.
dc.contributor.authorAçlkel, C.
dc.contributor.authorSaygun, I.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:47:15Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:47:15Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Bal] Mehmet Vehbi, Department of Periodontology, Gülhane Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Keskiner] Ilker, Department of Periodontology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Sezer] Ufuk, Department of Periodontology, Bezmiâlem Vakıf Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; [Açlkel] Cengizhan, Department of Public Health, Gülhane Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Saygun] Işil, Department of Periodontology, Gülhane Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of low-level laser (LLL) and desensitizing paste (DP) containing 8% arginine-calcium carbonate, in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) and also to determine whether their combined application would improve the efficacy of the treatment. Background data: There are various options for the treatment of DH; however, superiority of one method over others alone has not been currently demonstrated. Materials and methods: Twenty-one patients with 156 teeth affected by DH were included in the study. Selected teeth were randomly divided into five groups: LLL, DP, laser followed by DP (LLL+DP), DP followed by laser (DP+LLL) applied to one of the quadrants, and a control group, consisting of a randomly selected additional tooth in one of the quadrants. Teeth were irradiated by the 685nm diode laser treatment with 25mW at 9Hz for 100sec at 1cm2 area (2J/cm2) in interrupted mode. Pain response to evaporative stimulus was quantified on a visual analogue scale (VAS) over a 90-day period. Results: All four treatment groups experienced significant and persistent decrease in the mean VAS score immediately post-treatment until the end of the study, whereas the placebo group had high VAS scores throughout the study. On day 90, percent reduction in VAS scores was 72% for LLL, 65.4% for DP, 54.6% for LLL+DP, and 69.6% for DP+LLL, whereas the placebo group showed an increase of 7.8%. Conclusions: The application of either LLL or DP containing 8% arginine-calcium carbonate appears to be effective in decreasing DH. However, their combined use does not improve the efficacy beyond what is attainable with either treatment alone. © Copyright 2015, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2015.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/pho.2014.3873
dc.identifier.endpage205en_US
dc.identifier.issn1549-5418
dc.identifier.issn1557-8550
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25764483
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84926457044
dc.identifier.startpage200en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2014.3873
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000352341300004
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofPhotomedicine and Laser Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.journalPhotomedicine and Laser Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleComparison of Low Level Laser and Arginine-Calcium Carbonate Alone or Combination in the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Split-Mouth Clinical Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files