Publication: Investigation of the Effect of Catalyst Support on Oleic Acid Catalytic Deoxygenation for Green Diesel Production
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The presence of certain oxygenated species has led to the development of green diesel produced using deoxygenation (DO) technology to replace conventional biodiesel. The study focused on the effects of the supports on the deoxygenation of oleic acid using the CoMo catalyst. The results of this study revealed that the Molybdenum and Cobalt species have a significant influence on the reactivity and distribution of the product. The CoMo-based catalyst supported on Cerium oxide (CeO2), Titanium dioxide (TiO2), activated carbon (AC), and Aluminum oxide (Al2O3) were prepared by wet impregnation method and then calcinated under 20 mL min(-1) N-2 flow for 4 h at a temperature of 550 degrees C. The prepared catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET), Thermo-Gravimetric Analysis (TGA), and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) analysis. The influence of support type (activated carbon, Al2O2, CeO2, and TiO2) on the removal of various oxygenated functional groups was examined during the deoxygenation of oleic acid using supported CoMo catalysts at 350 degrees C and atmospheric pressure. The deoxygenated liquid products were characterized by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS), Higher heating value (HHV), and CHNOS analysis. The yield of hydrocarbons increased in the order Blank < CoMo/TiO2 < CoMo/CeO2 < CoMo/Al2O3 < CoMo/AC. Based on the study results, CoMo/AC is the most active catalyst with 93.20% hydrocarbon yield for 2 h. at 350 degrees C and 300 rpm in the absence of hydrogen. However, a significant deoxygenation reaction was still observed for the catalysts having CoMo supported on Al2O3, CeO2, and TiO2. In summary, CoMo/AC demonstrates better catalytic performance, attributed to its favorable physicochemical properties.
Description
Keywords
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q2
Source
Journal of Porous Materials
Volume
32
Issue
3
Start Page
941
End Page
952
