Publication:
Comparative Analysis of Bayesian Methods and GBLUP for Genomic Evaluations in Dairy Cattle

dc.authorscopusid55628979400
dc.authorscopusid24385660900
dc.authorscopusid6507081490
dc.authorscopusid58642285500
dc.authorscopusid24382127700
dc.authorwosidSitkowska, Beata/Aaw-8726-2020
dc.authorwosidPiwczyński, Dariusz/J-3375-2016
dc.authorwosidKolenda, Magdalena/T-9937-2018
dc.contributor.authorKolenda, Magdalena
dc.contributor.authorOnder, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorPiwczynski, Dariusz
dc.contributor.authorKurnaz, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorSitkowska, Beata
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:46:57Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Kolenda, Magdalena; Piwczynski, Dariusz; Sitkowska, Beata] Bydgoszcz Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Anim Breeding & Biol, Dept Anim Biotechnol & Genet, Bydgoszcz, Poland; [Onder, Hasan; Kurnaz, Burcu] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Anim Sci, Samsun, Turkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the effects of Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP) and Bayesian alphabet methods (A, B, C and Cp) were investigated on genomic predictions and indirect estimations in the Polish Holstein Friesian (PHF) dairy cattle population. The study analysed the milk yield data (MY, kg/lactation) and 13,481 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype records from 534 Polish Holstein Friesian (PHF) dairy cattle raised on private farms in Poland. The quality control of the genotypic data included the removal of monomorphic loci and the exclusion of samples with SNP missing rates exceeding 10%. After the quality control, 493 animals and 13,250 SNPs were retained for the genomic prediction. Marker effects and genomic breeding values (GEBVs) were calculated using the Bayesian alphabet and GBLUP. The results indicated that, for the milk yield of PHF cows, the Bayes C method outperformed other approaches. This method achieved the highest prediction accuracy among the evaluated methods. Additionally, the Bayes C method required the shortest computational time, underscoring its efficiency.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMinister of Science under the 'Regional Initiative of Excellence'; Ondokuz Mayimath;s University Scientific Research Office; [RID/SP/0017/2024/01]; [BN-WHiBZ-4/2022]; [PYO. ZRT.1901.22.001]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was financially supported by the Minister of Science under the 'Regional Initiative of Excellence' (RID/SP/0017/2024/01) programme. This article/material has been supported by the statutory activity, BN-WHiBZ-4/2022. This study was supported by the Ondokuz May & imath;s University Scientific Research Office with Project Number PYO. ZRT.1901.22.001.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.3409/fb_73-1.03
dc.identifier.issn0015-5500
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105006914831
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3409/fb_73-1.03
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/39192
dc.identifier.volume73en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001482996200002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCharles Univ Prague, First Faculty Medicineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFolia Biologicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBayesian Alphabeten_US
dc.subjectGenomic Predictionen_US
dc.subjectHolstein Friesianen_US
dc.subjectMilk Yielden_US
dc.titleComparative Analysis of Bayesian Methods and GBLUP for Genomic Evaluations in Dairy Cattleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files