Publication:
The Treatment of Displaced Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children (An Evaluation of Three Different Treatment Methods)

dc.authorscopusid6507867533
dc.authorscopusid35550064900
dc.authorscopusid6603570331
dc.contributor.authorDiri, B.
dc.contributor.authorTomak, Y.
dc.contributor.authorKaraismailoǧlu, T.N.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T02:12:29Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Diri] Bülent, Tip Fakültesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dali, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Tomak] Yılmaz, Tip Fakültesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dali, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Karaismailoǧlu] Turgut Nedim, Tip Fakültesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dali, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Supracondylar fractures of the humerus are the most common fracture pattern of the elbow in childhood. They require close follow-up subsequent to successful treatment, because of having a great risk of many complications. Many treatment methods have been described for the treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus, however it has not been reached a consensus for the choice of the treatment. The purpose of this study is to investigate the late results of three different treatment methods; closed reduction+cast immobilization, skeletal traction+cast immobilization and open reduction+internal fixation by K-wires. We also aimed to compare these methods with the results of current literature. METHODS: Fifty-three (41 boys and 12 girls) displaced supracondylar humerus fractures were treated between January 1986 and March 1999. The average age was 8.0 years. We evaluated the results of patients according to Flynn's criterias. RESULTS: According to the results of the study, we obtained 31 excellent, 9 good, 5 fair and 8 poor results. The ratio of poor results of closed reduction+cast immobilization, skeletal traction+cast immobilization and open reduction+internal fixation by K-wires were 28.6%, 14.3% and 12.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The datas in our study show that closed reduction+cast immobilization results in the most poorest outcome in the treatment of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage69en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid12587058.0
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0038546579
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage62en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/47817
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofUlusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleThe Treatment of Displaced Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children (An Evaluation of Three Different Treatment Methods)en_US
dc.title.alternativeÇocuk Deplase Suprakondiler Humerus Kırıklarının Tedavisi (Üç Farklı Tedavi Yönteminin İncelenmesi)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files