Publication:
Hydrological Modelling of Karst Catchment Using Lumped Conceptual and Data Mining Models

dc.authorscopusid57207685341
dc.authorscopusid56019823000
dc.authorscopusid55461096500
dc.authorscopusid23096457300
dc.contributor.authorSezen, C.
dc.contributor.authorBezak, N.
dc.contributor.authorBai, Y.
dc.contributor.authorSraj, M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:26:03Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:26:03Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Sezen] Cenk, Faculty of Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Bezak] Nejc, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Univerza v Ljubljani, Ljubljana, Slovenia; [Bai] Yun, National Research Base of Intelligent Manufacturing Service, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, China; [Sraj] Mojca, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Univerza v Ljubljani, Ljubljana, Sloveniaen_US
dc.description.abstractHydrological modelling is a challenging and significant issue, especially in nonhomogeneous catchments in terms of geology, and it is an essential part of water resources management. In this study, daily rainfall-runoff modelling was carried out using the lumped conceptual model, the artificial neural network (ANN), the deep-neural network (DNN), and regression tree (RT) data mining models for the nonhomogeneous karst Ljubljanica catchment and four of its sub-catchments in Slovenia with different geological characteristics. Model performance was evaluated using several performance criteria and additional investigation of low and high flows was carried out. The results of the study indicate that the Génie Rural à 4 paramètres Journalier (GR4J) lumped conceptual model yielded better modelling performance compared to the data-driven models, namely ANN, DNN and RT models. Moreover, the enhanced version of the GR4J model (i.e. GR6J) also yielded good performance in terms of the recession part. The RT model yielded the worst performance regarding runoff forecasting among the examined models in the case of all five investigated catchments. However, ANN and DNN data-driven models were slightly more successful in modelling the hydrograph recession in the case of karst sub-catchments compared to the GR4J lumped conceptual model structure. Inclusion of additional meteorological variables to ANN and DNN does not significantly improve modelling results. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.036
dc.identifier.endpage110en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-1694
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85067585304
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage98en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.036
dc.identifier.volume576en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000486092200009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Hydrologyen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Hydrologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectData Miningen_US
dc.subjectHydrological Modelen_US
dc.subjectKarsten_US
dc.subjectLjubljanica Riveren_US
dc.subjectLumped Conceptual Modelen_US
dc.subjectNonhomogeneous Catchmenten_US
dc.titleHydrological Modelling of Karst Catchment Using Lumped Conceptual and Data Mining Modelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files