Publication:
Opinions of Stakeholders About Evaluation of Middle-School Turkish and English Curriculum Dimensions

dc.authorscopusid35769117600
dc.authorscopusid58487693300
dc.contributor.authorGelen, İ.
dc.contributor.authorAliş, E.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:16:34Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Gelen] İsmail, Department of Science Education, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Aliş] Esra, Kanberli- İlyaslı Elementary School, Bafra, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the research is to describe the problems in the program evaluation field according to curriculum's four different dimensions, to search if the problems differ significantly according to students’ class level and teachers’, administrators’/inspectors’ seniority. The research used one of the quantitative research methods, the field survey model, which is descriptive research. The population of the research is Samsun city, and the target population of the research is middle-school students, teachers of Turkish and English branches, inspectors and administrators working at secondary schools in Samsun city’s districts Atakum, Bafra, Canik and İlkadım. The research sample consists of middle-school students, teachers of Turkish and English branches, inspectors and administrators working at middle-schools in these districts, chosen with stratified sampling, a random sampling method. In the research, “Survey of Defining Problems about Curriculum Dimensions” is completed by the students, teachers and inspectors/administrators. When the participants’ problems about the curriculum dimensions are examined, it is revealed that the most common problems they face is the lack of adequacy of functionality, flexibility, practicality, scientificness and actuality of the dimensions of curriculum. It is concluded that students’ issues with program evaluation differ according to their class levels whereas the inspectors’/administrators’ problems with program evaluation do not differ significantly according to their seniority. © The Author(s).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5430/jct.v8n4p13
dc.identifier.endpage28en_US
dc.identifier.issn1927-2677
dc.identifier.issn1927-2685
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85164798415
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage13en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v8n4p13
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/36186
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSciedu Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Curriculum and Teachingen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCurriculumen_US
dc.subjectCurriculum Dimensionsen_US
dc.subjectProgram Evaluationen_US
dc.titleOpinions of Stakeholders About Evaluation of Middle-School Turkish and English Curriculum Dimensionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files