Publication:
Effects of Air Polishing on Surface Roughness of Dental Porcelains

Simple item page
dc.authorscopusid35366257300
dc.authorscopusid35092367100
dc.authorscopusid36552323600
dc.authorscopusid59469510200
dc.authorscopusid6505908267
dc.contributor.authorGüler, A.U.
dc.contributor.authorErgün Kunt, G.E.
dc.contributor.authorDuran, I.
dc.contributor.authorKurt, M.
dc.contributor.authorÖzkan, P.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:46:52Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:46:52Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Güler] Ahmet Umut, Department of Prosthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Ergün Kunt] Göknil, Department of Prosthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Duran] Ibrahim, Department of Prosthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Kurt] Murat, Department of Prosthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Özkan] Pelin, Department of Prosthodontics, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different air polishing powders on the surface roughness of different types of porcelain materials. Thirty specimens were prepared for each of four porcelain materials. All specimens were polished with a series of aluminium oxide polishing discs (Sof-Lex). Specimens of each of the porcelains were randomly divided into three groups (n=10 per group): Group-C for control, and two groups with different air-powder applications (Group-CP, Cavitron Prophy-Jet and Group-PS, Sirona ProSmile prophylaxis powder). A standard air polishing unit (ProSmileHandly) was used. Surface roughness measurements (Ra) were performed using a profilometer. The data were analysed with a two-way ANOVA, and mean values were compared by the Tukey honestly significant difference test (α=0.05). For all porcelain material groups, no significant difference was observed among Group-PS, Group-CP and Group C (p<0.05). Vita MarkII demonstrated statistically significantly less Ra values than the other porcelains tested. The highest Ra value was observed in Vita VMK95. Air polishing applications were not increased the surface roughness for porcelain materials tested. © 2010 W. S. Maney & Son Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1179/143307510X12820854748999
dc.identifier.endpage400en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-8917
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-78649440901
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage397en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1179/143307510X12820854748999
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000284530000011
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherManey Publishingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMaterials Research Innovationsen_US
dc.relation.journalMaterials Research Innovationsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAir Polishingen_US
dc.subjectDental Porcelainen_US
dc.subjectSodium Bicarbonateen_US
dc.subjectSurface Roughnessen_US
dc.titleEffects of Air Polishing on Surface Roughness of Dental Porcelainsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu