Publication:
Comparing the Innovation Performance of EU Candidate Countries: An Entropy-Based TOPSIS Approach

dc.authorscopusid57193628719
dc.authorscopusid43661044500
dc.authorscopusid7003495303
dc.contributor.authorKaynak, S.
dc.contributor.authorAltuntaş, S.
dc.contributor.authorDereli, T.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:27:53Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:27:53Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Kaynak] Selahattin, Department of Economics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Altuntaş] Serkan, Department of Industrial Engineering, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; [Dereli] Türkay, Office of the President, Iskenderun Technical University, Iskenderun, Hatay, Turkey, Department of Industrial Engineering, Gaziantep Üniversitesi, Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractInnovation is important for countries in the competitive global economy. It is one of the main criteria for countries to be superior, to remain competitive, and to produce high technology products. Countries allocate different types of incentives to encourage innovation activities in their countries. Innovation is also one of the strategic issues for the European Union (EU). The aim of this study is to compare the innovation performance of four EU candidate countries, Macedonia (FYR), Iceland, Serbia and Turkey. The entropy-based Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approach is proposed in this paper. First, the importance of each variable is computed by the entropy method to reflect on the differences among the variables in the calculation process. Subsequently, the TOPSIS method is performed by using the value and importance of variables for prioritisation of the candidate countries with respect to their innovation performance. Four case studies are conducted to show the viability of the proposed approach. Each cases study uses different reports, namely The Global Competitiveness Index, Innovation Union Scoreboard, Knowledge Assessment Methodology (KAM) and Global Innovation Index. The results of this study show that the proposed approach provides the same ranking as Innovation Union Scoreboard and KAM. © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1331677X.2016.1265895
dc.identifier.endpage54en_US
dc.identifier.issn1848-9664
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85015335433
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage31en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1265895
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000398181400003
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd. michael.wagreich@univie.ac.aten_US
dc.relation.ispartofEconomic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanjaen_US
dc.relation.journalEconomic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanjaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCandidate Countriesen_US
dc.subjectEntropy Methoden_US
dc.subjectEuropean Union (EU)en_US
dc.subjectInnovationen_US
dc.subjectTechnique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Methoden_US
dc.titleComparing the Innovation Performance of EU Candidate Countries: An Entropy-Based TOPSIS Approachen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files