Publication: Comparing the Innovation Performance of EU Candidate Countries: An Entropy-Based TOPSIS Approach
| dc.authorscopusid | 57193628719 | |
| dc.authorscopusid | 43661044500 | |
| dc.authorscopusid | 7003495303 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kaynak, S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Altuntaş, S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dereli, T. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-21T13:27:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-06-21T13:27:53Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.department | Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi | en_US |
| dc.department-temp | [Kaynak] Selahattin, Department of Economics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Altuntaş] Serkan, Department of Industrial Engineering, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; [Dereli] Türkay, Office of the President, Iskenderun Technical University, Iskenderun, Hatay, Turkey, Department of Industrial Engineering, Gaziantep Üniversitesi, Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Innovation is important for countries in the competitive global economy. It is one of the main criteria for countries to be superior, to remain competitive, and to produce high technology products. Countries allocate different types of incentives to encourage innovation activities in their countries. Innovation is also one of the strategic issues for the European Union (EU). The aim of this study is to compare the innovation performance of four EU candidate countries, Macedonia (FYR), Iceland, Serbia and Turkey. The entropy-based Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approach is proposed in this paper. First, the importance of each variable is computed by the entropy method to reflect on the differences among the variables in the calculation process. Subsequently, the TOPSIS method is performed by using the value and importance of variables for prioritisation of the candidate countries with respect to their innovation performance. Four case studies are conducted to show the viability of the proposed approach. Each cases study uses different reports, namely The Global Competitiveness Index, Innovation Union Scoreboard, Knowledge Assessment Methodology (KAM) and Global Innovation Index. The results of this study show that the proposed approach provides the same ranking as Innovation Union Scoreboard and KAM. © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/1331677X.2016.1265895 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 54 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1848-9664 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85015335433 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 31 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1265895 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 30 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000398181400003 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis Ltd. michael.wagreich@univie.ac.at | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja | en_US |
| dc.relation.journal | Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Candidate Countries | en_US |
| dc.subject | Entropy Method | en_US |
| dc.subject | European Union (EU) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Innovation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Method | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparing the Innovation Performance of EU Candidate Countries: An Entropy-Based TOPSIS Approach | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
