Publication:
Effect of Irbesartan Monotherapy Compared with ACE Inhibitors and Calcium-Channel Blockers on Patient Compliance in Essential Hypertension Patients: A Multicenter, Open-Labeled, Three-Armed Study

dc.contributor.authorKoylan, N
dc.contributor.authorAcarturk, E
dc.contributor.authorCanberk, A
dc.contributor.authorCaglar, N
dc.contributor.authorCaglar, S
dc.contributor.authorErdine, S
dc.contributor.authorBuyukozturk, K
dc.contributor.authorIDkabakci, giray/0000-0002-3275-7003
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:36:46Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:36:46Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.department-tempIstanbul Univ, Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkey -- Cukurova Univ, Fac Med, Adana, Turkey -- Ankara Univ, Fac Med, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey -- Hacettepe Univ, Fac Med, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey -- Istanbul Univ, Cerrahpasa Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkey -- Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Med, Izmir, Turkey -- Ege Univ, Fac Med, Izmir, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives. This multicenter, three-armed, open-labeled study investigated patient compliance of patients receiving irbesartan, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or calcium-channel blockers (CCB) for essential hypertension for a 6-month period. Patients were either newly diagnosed or switched from existing antiltypertensive medication due to lack of efficacy or side-effects. Methods. Patients were started monotherapy with irbesartan (n=377), ACE inhibitors (n=298) or CCB (n=308) and were reevaluated on 1st, 3rd, and 6th months of the treatment. The primary endpoint was patient compliance, assessed by proportion of patients who had taken their study medication every day. Efficacy was recorded as mean reductions in blood pressure and the proportion of patients whose blood pressure normalized. Tolerability was assessed by reported adverse events. Results. Significantly more patients receiving irbesartan had complied with study medication after 3 and 6 months of treatment than ACE inhibitors or CCB. Significantly fewer patients receiving irbesartan needed to change their antihypertensive medication. All three study treatments exhibited similar efficacy profiles, but irbesartan had significantly less adverse events. Conclusions. This study demonstrated that patient compliance to irbesartan was significantly superior to other study treatments. Irbesartan is therefore a suitable first-line therapy for essential hypertension in everyday clinical practice.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/08038020510040649
dc.identifier.endpage31en_US
dc.identifier.issn1651-1999
dc.identifier.pmid16060413
dc.identifier.startpage23en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/08038020510040649
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/21033
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000230898400004
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.journalBlood Pressureen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectACE Inhibitorsen_US
dc.subjectAngiotensin II Receptor Antagonistsen_US
dc.subjectCalcium-Channel Blockersen_US
dc.subjectComplianceen_US
dc.subjectEssential Hypertensionen_US
dc.subjectIrbesartanen_US
dc.titleEffect of Irbesartan Monotherapy Compared with ACE Inhibitors and Calcium-Channel Blockers on Patient Compliance in Essential Hypertension Patients: A Multicenter, Open-Labeled, Three-Armed Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files