Publication:
Torsional Resistance of ProGlider, Hyflex EDM, and One G Glide Path Instruments

Simple item page
dc.authorscopusid22934205900
dc.authorscopusid56471565700
dc.contributor.authorInan, U.
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, C.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:25:52Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:25:52Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Inan] Uǧur, Department of Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Keskin] Cangül, Department of Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The present study aimed to compare the torsional resistance of ProGlider (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Hyflex EDM (Coltene-Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland), and One G (Micro-Mega, Besancon, France) glide path instruments. Methods: Fifteen ProGlider (16.02∼08), 15 Hyflex EDM (10.05), and 15 One G (14.03) instruments were collected and tested for torsional strength using a custom-designed testing device. Data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc tests with 5% significance level. The tested specimens were examined under a scanning electron microscope. Results: There was no significant difference between Hyflex EDM and ProGlider regarding their torsional resistance values (P > .05). One G showed the lowest torsional resistance (P < .05). Hyflex EDM exhibited the highest angle of rotation values among the instruments (P < .05). Conclusions: Hyflex EDM and ProGlider instruments had significantly higher torsional fatigue resistance than One G instruments, whereas Hyflex EDM showed the highest angle of rotation values. The differences in the torsional resistances might be associated with their different design features and manufacturing processes. © 2019 American Association of Endodontistsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2019.06.012
dc.identifier.endpage1257en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31409495
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85070305159
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1253en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.06.012
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/10571
dc.identifier.volume45en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000490058800012
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Inc. usjcs@elsevier.comen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGlide Pathen_US
dc.subjectNickel Titaniumen_US
dc.subjectTorsional Resistanceen_US
dc.titleTorsional Resistance of ProGlider, Hyflex EDM, and One G Glide Path Instrumentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu