Publication:
Investigation the Anterior Mandibular Lingual Concavity by Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

dc.authorscopusid57223999008
dc.authorscopusid57210663500
dc.authorscopusid54581049600
dc.contributor.authorÇi̇ti̇r, M.
dc.contributor.authorGündüz, K.
dc.contributor.authorKasap, P.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:28:24Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Çi̇ti̇r] Mesude, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Tokat, Turkey; [Gündüz] Kaan, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Kasap] Pelin, Department of Statistics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: In the presence of lingual concavity in the mandible, the cortical perforation and consequently the life-threatening intraoral haemorrhages obstructing the upper respiratory tract may be seen during the surgical intervention. The present study was aimed to determine the prevalence of lingual concavity in the interforaminal region and its relationship with gender and dentate status. Materials and methods: The images of 106 patients who underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) between 2016 and 2017 in Department of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology Department of Faculty of Dentistry of Ondokuz Mayıs University were retrospectively examined. The images were obtained using a Galileos device (98 kVp, 15-30 mA). The bone height and width in interforaminal region and the frequency of lingual concavity were analysed. Results: Of patients involved in the present study, 42.5% were male and 57.5% were female After the examinations performed, the bone was morphologically classified into four classes as type I lingual concavity, type II inclined to lingual, type III enlarging towards labiolingual and type IV buccal concavity. Type III (77.9%) was the most common type in the anterior region, followed by type II (16.5%), type I (4.7%) and type IV (0.9%). The lingual concavity angle was 76.5 ± 3.69ºand the concavity depth was 2.09 ± 0.34 mm. Conclusions: The lingual concavity can be detected by using the cross-sectional CBCT images and the complications related with lingual cortical perforation can be prevented. © © 2021 Via Medicaen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5603/FM.A2020.0128
dc.identifier.endpage922en_US
dc.identifier.issn0015-5659
dc.identifier.issn1644-3284
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33084005.0
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85121737759
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage916en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5603/FM.A2020.0128
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/36538
dc.identifier.volume80en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherVia Medicaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFolia Morphologicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnterioren_US
dc.subjectConcavityen_US
dc.subjectCone-Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectDental Implanten_US
dc.subjectMandibleen_US
dc.titleInvestigation the Anterior Mandibular Lingual Concavity by Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files