Publication:
The Double Wire Technique: An Alternative Method for Difficult Ureteroscopic Access

dc.authorscopusid26633591500
dc.authorscopusid11240177700
dc.authorscopusid54419415500
dc.authorscopusid8967520200
dc.contributor.authorBostanci, Y.
dc.contributor.authorÖzden, E.
dc.contributor.authorAtac, F.
dc.contributor.authorYakupoglu, Y.K.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:17:13Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:17:13Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Bostanci] Yakup, Department of Urology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Özden] Ender, Department of Urology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Atac] Fatih, Department of Urology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Yakupoglu] Yarkin Kamil, Department of Urology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractWe read with great interest the study report by Ji et al. (Urol Res, doi:10.1007/s00240-012-0476-0, 2012) about the impact of the intentional ureteral stenting on the success rate of calculus extraction by second ureteroscopy, when the initial ureteroscopy failed. Actually, sometimes ureteral stone treatment pose challenging problems for the urologists. This study has Wlled an important gap on this Weld. If Xexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripter are not available pre-existing stent may improve the success rate of a subsequent ureteroscopy for impacted ureteral stones. Because, post-stent ureteroscopy has the advantage of working through a dilated ureter. We would like to add some additional comments and suggestions in addition to the authors' discussion, which is noteworthy in several respects. In 1.6-2.7 % of cases [2, 3], a ureteroscope Wnds it hard to pass the meatus, to run through the intramural ureter, or to reach the lesion. A reduction in size and improvements in the shape of instruments have rendered such occurrences somewhat rare, however not totally obsolete. When the ureteral oriWce is too narrow to accommodate a ureteroscope, dilation may be accomplished with serial dilators, balloons, or even the ureteroscope itself with the risk of trauma and the potential for long-term stricture formation. © Springer-Verlag 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00240-012-0491-1
dc.identifier.endpage784en_US
dc.identifier.issn0300-5623
dc.identifier.issn1434-0879
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22760672
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84874105782
dc.identifier.startpage783en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-012-0491-1
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000310965700021
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofUrological Researchen_US
dc.relation.journalUrological Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleThe Double Wire Technique: An Alternative Method for Difficult Ureteroscopic Accessen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files