Publication:
Application of Patch Test in Allergic (Atopic) Dogs and Investigation of Dog Allergy Incidence in People

dc.authorscopusid6603117404
dc.authorscopusid6603040795
dc.authorscopusid7003939060
dc.authorscopusid16027779600
dc.contributor.authorSancak, A.A.
dc.contributor.authorŞahal, M.
dc.contributor.authorYasa-Duru, S.Y.
dc.contributor.authorÇakiroǧlu, D.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-10T21:34:39Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Sancak] Aziz Arda, Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Şahal] Mehmet, Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Yasa-Duru] Sibel, Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Çakiroǧlu] Duygu, Department of Internal Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractIncidence of canine allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is difficult to determine, although it is regularly encountered in veterinary practice. Patch testing is a non-invasive method of determining contact allergens that may cause eczematous skin eruptions in dogs, although standardization of the procedure is yet to be completed. The aim of the present study was to determine the frequency of contact sensitizations in dogs with dermatitis, to interpret the results from standardized allergens, and to evaluate their clinical relevance. Sensitivity to pet animals is a frequent cause of allergic symptoms in atopic human patients and/or patients with asthma. Therefore, we also try to determine the possible allergic hypersensitivity of dog owners to their own dogs. European patch test standard serial was applied to 22 allergic dogs. Test results were positive in 9 (41%) dogs with allergic dermatitis. Nickel sulphate, potassium dichromate, bis-diethydithiocarbamato-zinc, p-t-butylph.-formaldehyde-resin, fragrance mix, benzocaine, ammoniated mercury, mercapto mix and Cetylstearylalcohol were the positive allergens determined. Specific IgE (dog epithelium and dandruff) floroenzymeimmunoassay was applied to blood samples of dog owners (n = 12), as well as to a control group of non-owners (n = 10). Although the dog owners were not demonstrating any signs of allergic symptoms, they all were positive for specific IgE. On the other hand, in the control group, only 4 people (40%) were positive with specific IgE. Our data suggest that complete avoidance of dog antigen may not be possible. Moreover, these findings support the potential involvement of contact allergens in dogs with atopic dermatitis.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage117en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0861
dc.identifier.issn1308-2817
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77955348194
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage113en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/34739
dc.identifier.volume56en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnkara Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAtopic Dermatitisen_US
dc.subjectContact Allergyen_US
dc.subjectDogen_US
dc.subjectPatch Testen_US
dc.titleApplication of Patch Test in Allergic (Atopic) Dogs and Investigation of Dog Allergy Incidence in Peopleen_US
dc.title.alternativeAlerjik (Atopik) Köpeklerde Yama Testi Uygulamaları ve İnsanlarda Köpek Alerjisi İnsidansının Araştırılmasıen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files