Publication:
Electromyographic Responses of Knee Isokinetic and Single-Leg Hop Tests in Athletes: Dominant vs. Non-Dominant Sides

dc.authorscopusid57208105549
dc.authorscopusid54787802000
dc.authorwosidYilmaz, Ali Kerim/Aaa-5014-2022
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Ali Kerim
dc.contributor.authorKabadayi, Menderes
dc.contributor.authorIDYilmaz, Ali Kerim/0000-0002-0046-6711
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:12:29Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Yilmaz, Ali Kerim; Kabadayi, Menderes] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Yasar Dogu Sport Sci, TR-55100 Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionYilmaz, Ali Kerim/0000-0002-0046-6711;en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the study is to perform the electromyographic (EMG) analysis of isokinetic and single-leg hop tests (SLHTs). We included 20 healthy male athletes (age: 23.18 years, height: 178.82 cm, weight: 73.76 kg and BMI: 47 kg/m(2)) voluntarily. Isokinetic knee strength tests at at 60 degrees sec(-1), 180 degrees sec(-1), 240 degrees sec(-1) velocities and different SLHTs; Single leg (SL), Triple leg (THD) and Crossover (CHD) hop for distance tests, 6 m timed-hop test (6 m THT), Single leg vertical jump test (VJ) were measured. Muscle activations of quadriceps (Q); vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL), rectus femoris (RF) and hamstring (H); biceps femoris (BF) were obtained. There were significant differences in SL, THD, CHD and VJ in DS (p < 0.05).VJ revealed a statistical significance in NDS (p = 0.003). The comparison of the activations produced by the same muscles in different tests showed statistically significant differences in all the muscles for both sides (p < 0.05). In conclusion, we determined that the muscles produce similar activations in the isokinetic tests for both the DS and NDS, whereas there are differences in some of the SLHTs. The most active muscles were VM and RF (medial muscles) in isokinetic tests, and VL (lateral muscle) in SLHTs.gen_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15438627.2020.1860047
dc.identifier.endpage243en_US
dc.identifier.issn1543-8627
dc.identifier.issn1543-8635
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33302742
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85106790717
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage229en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/15438627.2020.1860047
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/42014
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000597860900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofResearch in Sports Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectHop Testsen_US
dc.subjectElectromyographyen_US
dc.subjectIsokineticen_US
dc.subjectAthletesen_US
dc.subjectHamstringen_US
dc.subjectQuadricepsen_US
dc.titleElectromyographic Responses of Knee Isokinetic and Single-Leg Hop Tests in Athletes: Dominant vs. Non-Dominant Sidesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files