Publication:
Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris During Root Canal Filling Material Removal in Teeth With External Apical Root Resorption: A Comparison of Different Obturation Techniques

dc.authorscopusid58770492800
dc.authorscopusid36865586800
dc.authorwosidUzun, İsmail/Aab-5472-2022
dc.contributor.authorCaglar, Busra Melike
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorIDUzun, İsmail/0000-0003-3353-3260
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:11:05Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Caglar, Busra Melike] Samsun Cent Dent Hosp, Endodontist, Samsun, Turkiye; [Uzun, Ismail] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Endodont, Samsun, Turkiyeen_US
dc.descriptionUzun, İsmail/0000-0003-3353-3260en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Root canal retreatment is necessary when initial treatment fails. Nickel-titanium systems help remove filling materials; however, some methods can cause canal content extrusion, resulting in inflammation and delayed healing. This study aimed to examine the impact of different preparation techniques and endodontic file systems on apical debris volume to limit material dispersion to periradicular tissues. Methods: Ninety extracted maxillary incisors were evaluated. Simulated apical root resorption was created by removing the apical 2 mm of the root. The teeth were divided into two groups: one filled with a single cone and the other with cold lateral compaction (CLC). Each group was further divided into three subgroups (n = 15 each): Subgroup 1 used Reciproc R25 for removal and R50 for final preparation; Subgroup 2 used ProTaper Universal Retreatment (PTUR) files D1, D2, and D3 for removal and ProTaper Next X5 for finalization; and Subgroup 3 used VDW.Rotate Retreatment (VDW.RotateR) for removal and VDW.Rotate 50.04 for completion. Debris from retreatment was collected in pre-weighed tubes to determine the amount. The apical extrusion data underwent a two-way analysis of variance. Results: The Reciproc group had a mean extruded debris weight of 0.54 +/- 0.24 mg, higher than the PTUR (0.28 +/- 0.15 mg) and VDW.RotateR (0.39 +/- 0.29 mg) groups (p < 0.05). The single-cone technique (SCT) resulted in a mean debris weight of 0.34 +/- 0.23 mg, lower than the CLC technique, which had a mean of 0.46 +/- 0.27 mg (p < 0.05). SCT had a shorter retreatment duration (111.12 +/- 33.46 s) compared to CLC (176.26 +/- 52.26 s) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The Reciproc file system and the CLC obturation technique resulted in greater apical debris extrusion than the other methods. SCT was quicker than CLC. The Reciproc groups are more susceptible to apex extrusion during retreatment.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSamsun Ondokuz Mayis University Research Fund [PYO.DIS.1904.20.007]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Samsun Ondokuz Mayis University Research Fund (Project No: PYO.DIS.1904.20.007)en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12903-024-04833-2
dc.identifier.issn1472-6831
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid39261778
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85203522306
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04833-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/41906
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001310631200006
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Oral Healthen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectApical Debris Extrusionen_US
dc.subjectSimulated Apical Root Resorptionen_US
dc.subjectEndodonticen_US
dc.subjectRetreatmenten_US
dc.subjectReciprocen_US
dc.subjectPTuren_US
dc.subjectVDW.Rotateren_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Apically Extruded Debris During Root Canal Filling Material Removal in Teeth With External Apical Root Resorption: A Comparison of Different Obturation Techniquesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files