Publication:
Bacterial Penetration After Obturation With Four Different Root Canal Sealers

dc.authorscopusid56212055300
dc.authorscopusid8366990800
dc.authorscopusid35366257300
dc.authorscopusid14068418700
dc.contributor.authorYücel, A.Ç.
dc.contributor.authorGüler, E.
dc.contributor.authorGüler, A.U.
dc.contributor.authorErtaş, E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:25:54Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:25:54Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Yücel] Ali Çaǧin, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Güler] Eda, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Güler] Ahmet Umut, Department of Prosthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Ertaş] Ertan, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare bacterial penetration after obturation with lateral compaction technique using four different root canal sealers. This study was performed on 100 teeth including negative control (n = 10), positive control (n = 10), and experimental groups (n = 80). 80 teeth were randomly divided into five groups of 20 teeth each and obturated with AH 26 (A), AH Plus (AP), Sealapex (S), Ketac-Endo (K) root canal sealers. Evaluation was carried out for 60 days. After 30 days of comparing the bacterial penetration values, total penetration was observed in 85% of the Group AP, and group K, 80% of the group S, and 75% of the group A. According to the results of χ2 test, there was no statistically significant difference observed between any groups (p > 0.05). After 60 days of comparing the bacterial penetration values, total penetration was observed in 100% of the group AP, group K, and group S and 95% of the group A. It may be concluded that under the conditions of this study, there was no difference in the bacterial penetration of the four root canal sealers tested at 30 and 60 days. © 2006 American Association of Endodontists.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2006.04.002
dc.identifier.endpage893en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.pmid16934636
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33747367999
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage890en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.04.002
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000240568900015
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAH Plusen_US
dc.subjectAH26en_US
dc.subjectBacterial Penetrationen_US
dc.subjectKetac-Endoen_US
dc.subjectRoot Canal Sealeren_US
dc.subjectSealapexen_US
dc.titleBacterial Penetration After Obturation With Four Different Root Canal Sealersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files