Publication:
Mechanical and Physiological Responses of Two Different Anaerobic Test Modalities

dc.authorscopusid35729518400
dc.authorscopusid28767936600
dc.authorscopusid54787802000
dc.authorscopusid28767792100
dc.contributor.authorTaşmektepligil, M.Y.
dc.contributor.authorOzkaya, O.
dc.contributor.authorKabadayı, M.
dc.contributor.authorKuzucu, O.E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:29:04Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:29:04Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Taşmektepligil] Mehmet Yalçın, Department of Tourism Management, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Ozkaya] Ozgur, Department of Coaching Education, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Kabadayı] Menderes, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Kuzucu] Öncü Erinç, Department of Coaching Education, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe elliptical Wingate test (EWT) is a new exercise modality that enables whole body activation during tests, while the cycle Wingate test (CWT) is a traditionally used method for anaerobic performance. The purpose of this study was to analyze total peak blood lactate, plasma volume change in lactate and heart rate responses as well as peak power, average power, minimum power, power drop and fatigue index ratio on this new exercise modality and to compare the obtained results with those derived from the CWT. Based on a sample of 20 healthy subjects all of the above parameters were significantly greater for the EWT than for CWT (p<0.000). Consequently the EWT is associated with greater physiological responses and anaerobic outcomes compared to the CWT. © 2012 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/IES-2012-0438
dc.identifier.endpage39en_US
dc.identifier.issn0959-3020
dc.identifier.issn1878-5913
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84857321425
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage37en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3233/IES-2012-0438
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000300695200007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIOS Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIsokinetics and Exercise Scienceen_US
dc.relation.journalIsokinetics and Exercise Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCycle Ergometeren_US
dc.subjectElliptical Wingate Anaerobic Testen_US
dc.subjectHeart Rateen_US
dc.subjectLactateen_US
dc.titleMechanical and Physiological Responses of Two Different Anaerobic Test Modalitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files