Publication:
Long-Term Sustained Virological Response Rate in Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Patients

dc.authorwosidLeblebicioglu, Hakan/A-3960-2016
dc.contributor.authorSunbul, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorKuruoglu, Tuba
dc.contributor.authorHoroz, Ismail Hakki
dc.contributor.authorEsen, Saban
dc.contributor.authorEroglu, Cafer
dc.contributor.authorLeblebicioglu, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorIDLeblebicioglu, Hakan/0000-0002-6033-8543
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:05:20Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Sunbul, Mustafa; Kuruoglu, Tuba; Horoz, Ismail Hakki; Esen, Saban; Eroglu, Cafer; Leblebicioglu, Hakan] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Tip Fak, Enfeksiyon Hastaliklan & Klin Mikrobiyol Anabilim, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionLeblebicioglu, Hakan/0000-0002-6033-8543en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, it was aimed to evaluate the relationship between long-term sustained virological response (LTSVR) rate and antiviral treatment, retrospectively. Eighty seven chronic hepatitis C patients were enrolled in this study. In the 12 week of the treatment, a negative HCV RNA determined by RT-PCR or 2-log decrease in HCV RNA was considered as early virological response (EVR). The virological response at the end of the treatment was considered as post-treatment viral response. The response after six months of the treatment was considered as sustained virological response (SVR). The response after one year of the treatment was considered as long term sustained virological response (LTSVR). Thirty six of 87 patients were male and 41 were patients and peg-IFN plus ribavirin to 19 patients. EVR, post-treatment viral response, SVR and LTSVR ratios were 72.4%, 67.8%, 51.7% and 45.9%, respectively. The ratio of LTSVR was higher in EVR detected patients. The LTSVR was present for two years in 95%, three years in 70%, four years in 60%, five years in 22.5%, six years in 7.5% and eight years in 2.5% of the patients. The differences between the LTSVR in the patients that were treated with monotherapy and either combination therapies was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the LTSVR ratiowashigher inCHCpatientswhohad EVR or treated with combination therapy.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexEmerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.endpage11en_US
dc.identifier.issn1307-9441
dc.identifier.issn2147-2939
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/41254
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000217150500001
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherGalenos Yayinciliken_US
dc.relation.ispartofViral Hepatit Dergisi-Viral Hepatitis Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLong-Term Sustained Responseen_US
dc.subjectEarly Virological Responseen_US
dc.subjectHepatitis C Virusen_US
dc.subjectInterferon-Alphaen_US
dc.subjectRibavirinen_US
dc.titleLong-Term Sustained Virological Response Rate in Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files