Publication:
Comparison of Speed Control Bumps and Humps According to Whole-Body Vibration Exposure

dc.authorscopusid36006460400
dc.authorscopusid7801543390
dc.contributor.authorKirbas¸, U.
dc.contributor.authorKarasahin, M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:07:25Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:07:25Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Kirbas¸] Ufuk, Department of Civil Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Karasahin] Mustafa, Department of Civil Engineering, İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractOne of the easiest and most efficient ways to control vehicle speeds is to create undulations perpendicular to the axis of the road. The types of undulations especially used for speed management on urban road networks are called speed control bumps (SCBs) and speed control humps (SCHs) according to their width. In general, the undulation geometry is a very important factor in changing the shock levels to which passing vehicles are exposed, and accordingly, in reducing the vehicle speeds. This study compares SCBs and SCHs with regard to human health risks using the whole-body vibration (WBV) components (VDV, S<inf>e</inf>, and R) to which vehicle drivers are exposed while passing over the undulations. Because SCBs and SCHs are usually preferred for use in urban road networks, experimental vibration measurements are conducted at 20, 30, 40, and 50 km=h vehicle speeds. In order to demonstrate the effects of different vehicle types, vibration measurements are repeated in the same driver and undulation geometries with sedan, hatchback, and station wagon vehicles for each measurement speed. The evaluations use standard evaluation methods which are frequently preferred in theworld inWBVanalysis. Using thesemethods, vehicle type and vehicle speed effects are reciprocally evaluated considering SCB and SCH geometries with equal heights. Use of the SCHs appears to be more suitable for human health in traffic speed management. © 2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/JTEPBS.0000177
dc.identifier.issn2473-2907
dc.identifier.issn2473-2893
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85049502287
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000177
dc.identifier.volume144en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000438697000013
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) onlinejls@asce.orgen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Transportation Engineering Part A-Systemsen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Transportation Engineering Part A-Systemsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSpeed Control Bumpen_US
dc.subjectSpeed Control Humpen_US
dc.subjectTraffic Calmingen_US
dc.subjectWhole-Body Vibrationen_US
dc.titleComparison of Speed Control Bumps and Humps According to Whole-Body Vibration Exposureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files