Publication:
Computational Intelligence Applied to the Least Limiting Water Range to Estimate Soil Water Content Using GIS and Geostatistical Approaches in Alluvial Lands*

dc.authorscopusid56297811900
dc.authorscopusid6603263487
dc.authorscopusid16052385200
dc.authorwosidAlaboz, Pelin/Abf-5309-2020
dc.authorwosidDengiz, Orhan/Abg-7284-2020
dc.contributor.authorAlaboz, Pelin
dc.contributor.authorBaskan, Oguz
dc.contributor.authorDengiz, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorIDAlaboz, Pelin/0000-0001-7345-938X
dc.contributor.authorIDDengiz, Orhan/0000-0002-0458-6016
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:15:45Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Alaboz, Pelin] Isparta Univ Appl Sci, Fac Agr, Dept Soil Sci & Plant Nutr, Isparta, Turkey; [Baskan, Oguz] Siirt Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Soil Sci & Plant Nutr, Siirt, Turkey; [Dengiz, Orhan] Ondokuz Maps Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Soil Sci & Plant Nutr, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionAlaboz, Pelin/0000-0001-7345-938X; Dengiz, Orhan/0000-0002-0458-6016en_US
dc.description.abstractThe use of machine learning methods in pedotransfer functions has attracted considerable attention in recent years. These methods are fast and effective in solving complex events. The least limiting water range (LLWR) feature is very important in terms of water uptake by the plant and root development in agricultural production. In this study, the predictability of the LLWR feature was investigated with artificial neural networks, deep learning (DL) and the k-nearest neighbour (k-NN) algorithm from machine learning methods. Estimated values obtained from the model with the best estimation accuracy and observed values were evaluated through a geostatistical method from which their spatial distribution maps were created. In the present study, which was carried out on alluvial lands with different soil properties, the LLWR values of soils vary between 5.5% and 25.9%. Field capacity, bulk density, clay, organic matter, and lime content properties, which have a high correlation with the LLWR, were taken into consideration in the estimation methods. DL was determined as the best estimation method (mean absolute error [MAE]: 0.94%; root mean square error [RMSE]: 1.45%; coefficient of determination [R-2]: 0.93), and the worst was k-NN (MAE: 2.00%; RMSE: 2.55%; R-2: 0.77) for the LLWR. In addition, the LLWR can be estimated with high accuracy by using ReLU and softmax functions in the DL method. The study shows that distribution maps created with LLWR values obtained by observed data and the DL method have a very similar pattern.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ird.2628
dc.identifier.endpage1144en_US
dc.identifier.issn1531-0353
dc.identifier.issn1531-0361
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85109765559
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage1129en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2628
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/42452
dc.identifier.volume70en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000672096300001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIrrigation and Drainageen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAlluvial Landsen_US
dc.subjectArtificial Neural Networksen_US
dc.subjectLeast Limiting Water Rangeen_US
dc.subjectPedotransfer Functionsen_US
dc.titleComputational Intelligence Applied to the Least Limiting Water Range to Estimate Soil Water Content Using GIS and Geostatistical Approaches in Alluvial Lands*en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files