Publication:
Influence of Different Implant Designs on Stress Distributions in All-On Concept: A Finite Element Analysis

dc.authorscopusid58951362400
dc.authorscopusid23470335700
dc.authorscopusid59536633300
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorMuglali, Mehtap
dc.contributor.authorCankaya, Rabia Tul Adeviye
dc.contributor.authorIDÇankaya, Rabi̇a Tül Adevi̇ye/0000-0001-9290-4901
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:53:50Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Ozturk, Hasan] Private Clin, Antalya, Turkiye; [Muglali, Mehtap; Cankaya, Rabia Tul Adeviye] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Samsun, Turkiyeen_US
dc.descriptionÇankaya, Rabi̇a Tül Adevi̇ye/0000-0001-9290-4901en_US
dc.description.abstractThe study aims to investigate the effect of different implant designs on stress distribution on the implant and mandibular bone in the All-on-four treatment concept using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis (FEA). A 3D FEA model was constructed based on the edentulous mandible's mean value. Eight different implant designs, consisting of two main groups with conical and cylindrical body geometry and four subgroups with four different thread designs, v-shaped, square, buttress, and reversible buttress in each group, were experimentally created in a computer environment. Implants 13 and 15 mm in length were inserted between the mental foraminas according to the All-on-Four concept, and the model was completed with an acrylic hybrid prosthesis created in a computer environment. A total force of 300N was applied with an oblique angle of 75 degrees to the occlusal plane on the premolar and 1st molar teeth. Von Mises stresses (VMS) on the implants, and minimum principal stresses (Pmin) on the cortical and trabecular bones were evaluated using the 3D FEA. VMS and Pmin were lower in the cortical bone around conical, square-thread implants. Stress levels were highest on the cortical bone at the implant neck in all groups, with greater stress observed around posteriorly inclined implants. No direct relationship with trabecular bone was identified. Given the study's limitations, the results suggest using conical squared implants in the All-on-Four concept.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcms.2025.02.032
dc.identifier.endpage920en_US
dc.identifier.issn1010-5182
dc.identifier.issn1878-4119
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid40113461
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105000492436
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage911en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.02.032
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/40071
dc.identifier.volume53en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001509065800001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstoneen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAll-On-Fouren_US
dc.subjectConical Implanten_US
dc.subjectCylindrical Implanten_US
dc.subjectFinite Element Analysisen_US
dc.subjectSquared Threaden_US
dc.titleInfluence of Different Implant Designs on Stress Distributions in All-On Concept: A Finite Element Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files