Publication:
Evaluation of Maxillary Palatal Process Pneumatization by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

dc.authorscopusid57028394100
dc.authorscopusid56114287700
dc.authorscopusid57210663500
dc.authorwosidSerindere, Mehmet/Hph-0207-2023
dc.authorwosidSerindere, Gozde/Hph-0265-2023
dc.contributor.authorSerindere, Gozde
dc.contributor.authorSerindere, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorGunduz, Kaan
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:45:17Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Serindere, Gozde] Hatay Mustafa Kemal Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Hatay, Turkiye; [Serindere, Mehmet] Hatay Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hatay, Turkiye; [Gunduz, Kaan] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Samsun, Turkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the pneumatization type of the palatal process (PTP) and angular and distance measurements of neighbouring structures on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods: 400 maxillary sinuses (MS) of 200 patients (96 female; 104 male; mean age: 43.2) were retrospectively evaluated. PTP was divided into three as types 1,2 and 3 and evaluated at distances 4, 8, 16, and 24 mm posterior to incisive foramen. The sinus and alveolar ridge height, palatonasal recess angle (PRA) and palatal junction angle (PJA) were also measured and recorded. Results: PTP I (101, 25.3%) was the most frequent type, followed by PTP II (95, 23.8%), and the least was PTP III (4, 1%). In patients with PTP I, the alveolar ridge height in the 4 mm and 8 mm group was significantly higher than in the patients with PTP II and III (p<0.05). In patients with PTP I, PRA in the 4 mm and 16 mm groups was significantly higher than in patients with PTP II and III (p<0.05). Sinus and alveolar ridge height, PRA and PJA did not differ significantly between the right and left sides in the 4 mm, 8 mm, 16 mm, and 24 mm groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Knowing the anatomy of the MS is very important fora successful surgical procedure in this area. Anatomy and pathology of the MS can be understood more clearly in CBCT. (c) 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101432
dc.identifier.issn2468-8509
dc.identifier.issn2468-7855
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36921841
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85161309659
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101432
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/38949
dc.identifier.volume124en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001060244400001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAlveolar Ridgeen_US
dc.subjectCone Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectMaxillary Sinusen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Maxillary Palatal Process Pneumatization by Cone-Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files