Publication:
Hydrological Modelling of the Karst Ljubljanica River Catchment Using Lumped Conceptual Model

dc.authorscopusid57207685341
dc.authorscopusid56019823000
dc.authorscopusid23096457300
dc.contributor.authorSezen, C.
dc.contributor.authorBezak, N.
dc.contributor.authorSraj, M.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-10T23:55:00Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Sezen] Cenk, Faculty of Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Bezak] Nejc, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Univerza v Ljubljani, Ljubljana, Slovenia; [Sraj] Mojca, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Univerza v Ljubljani, Ljubljana, Sloveniaen_US
dc.description.abstractModelling rainfall runoff is important for several human activities. For example, rainfall runoff models are needed for water resource planning and water system design. In this regard, the daily runoff was modelled using the Genie Rural, a 4-parameter Journalier (GR4J), Genie Rural, a 6-parameter Journalier (GR6J), and the CemaNeige GR6J lumped conceptual models that were developed by the IRSTEA Hydrology Group. The main difference among the tested models is in the complexity and processes that are considered in the various model versions. As a case study, the non-homogeneous mostly karst Ljubljanica River catchment down to the Moste discharge gauging station was selected. Models were evaluated using various efficiency criteria. For example, base flow index (BFI) was calculated for the results of all tested models and observed discharges in order to compare low flow simulation performance. Based on the presented results we can conclude that in case of the non-homogeneous and karst Ljubljanica catchment the CemaNeige GR6J yields better modelling results compared to the GR4J and GR6J models. Compared to the GR6J and GR4J model versions, the CemaNeige CR6J also includes the snow module and improved methodology for the low-flow simulations that are also included in the GR6J model version. © Sezen C. et al.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.15292/acta.hydro.2018.06
dc.identifier.endpage100en_US
dc.identifier.issn0352-3551
dc.identifier.issn1581-0267
dc.identifier.issue55en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85066335528
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage87en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15292/acta.hydro.2018.06
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/36100
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Hydrotechnicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCalibrationen_US
dc.subjectLjubljanica Riveren_US
dc.subjectLumped Conceptual Modelen_US
dc.subjectRainfall-Runoff Modellingen_US
dc.subjectValidationen_US
dc.titleHydrological Modelling of the Karst Ljubljanica River Catchment Using Lumped Conceptual Modelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files