Publication:
Comparing the Effects of Sugammadex and Neostigmine on Neuromuscular Block and Bispectral Index in Recovery From Intracranial Mass Resection Operations

dc.authorscopusid57200619907
dc.authorscopusid6701372559
dc.authorscopusid13103796700
dc.contributor.authorKurçaloğlu, M.
dc.contributor.authorSarıhasan, B.B.
dc.contributor.authorÇetinoǧlu, E.Ç.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:58:11Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Kurçaloğlu] Mustafa, Department of Anesthesiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Sarıhasan] Binnur, Department of Anesthesiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Çetinoǧlu] Erhan Çetin, Clinic of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Buyuk Anadolu Hospital, Samsun, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractNeuromuscular recovery (NMR) is a critical part of recovery from general anesthesia. Neostigmine is a choline esterase inhibitor and one of the leading agents which are used for NMR from non-depolarizing neuromuscular block. Its effect depends on competitive antagonism of the neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) in the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). Sugammadex is a new agent which has attracted attention with dramatically rapid NMR from non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NDNMBAs). It effects via chemically antagonizing NMBAs. In this study, effects of neostigmine and sugammadex concerning recovery from general anesthesia for intracranial mass excision operations were compared. Totally 60 patients were included in the study. Neostigmine was used for 30 patients, and sugammadex was used for 30 patients. Evaluation criteria were the train of four (TOF), bispectral index (BIS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Modified Aldrete Score (MAS), Ramsey Sedation Score (RSS), vital signs and existed complications. It is observed that NMR and recovery from anesthesia were significantly shorter in the sugammadex group (p<0,05). It is also seen that the duration of attaining BIS level to 80 was significantly shorter in the sugammadex group but this result is attributed to the artifact of the rapidly increasing neuromuscular activity in the sugammadex group. Conclusion: We suggest that both neostigmine and sugammadex are useful agents for NMR. Sugammadex has mor e advantages than neostigmine because of rapid onset of action without increased complications but much more studies are needed about sugammadex to take the place of neostigmine. © 2020, Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Tip Fakultesi. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5505/ejm.2020.99705
dc.identifier.endpage377en_US
dc.identifier.issn1301-0883
dc.identifier.issn1309-3886
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85089314619
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage371en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid377217
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5505/ejm.2020.99705
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/377217/comparing-the-effects-of-sugammadex-and-neostigmine-on-neuromuscular-block-and-bispectral-index-in-recovery-from-intracranial-mass-resection-operations
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/40472
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherYüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Eastern Journal of Medicine Van 65100en_US
dc.relation.ispartofEastern Journal of Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectNeostigmineen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative Recoveryen_US
dc.subjectSugammadexen_US
dc.titleComparing the Effects of Sugammadex and Neostigmine on Neuromuscular Block and Bispectral Index in Recovery From Intracranial Mass Resection Operationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files