Publication:
Investigation of Non-Native Learners’ Informal Learning Processes From Cognitive-Load Theory Perspective

dc.authorscopusid41961558200
dc.authorscopusid23396786100
dc.authorscopusid57203876224
dc.contributor.authorŞendurur, E.
dc.contributor.authorDoğusoy, B.
dc.contributor.authorYondemir Çalişkan, N.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:18:45Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:18:45Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Şendurur] Emine, Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Doğusoy] Berrin, Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Mersin Üniversitesi, Mersin, Turkey; [Yondemir Çalişkan] Neslihan, Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the subtitles embedded into either declarative or procedural video on non-native Turkish speakers’ understandings of the content. In addition, their perceived difficulties about and eye behaviors during watching the two videos were explored. There were 40 volunteer international students from various departments. Two experiments were designed to observe how participants’ retention performance changed according to the content given in the videos. As participants individually watching the videos, their eye behavior was recorded for more objective observations about their fixations on either subtitle or main areas of the screen. In this way, their eye behaviors and their retention performance were compared. The findings showed that there were no significant differences in participants’ scores of retention and perceived difficulty regardless of both the video type (declarative vs. procedural) and subtitle existence (subtitled vs. non-subtitled). Moreover, the declarative video was perceived as difficult despite being easy-to-follow. The eye movement data analysis showed that in both the video types, the number of fixations on the subtitle AOI and main AOI were high in a parallel way, but when the participants experienced with procedural video, the percentage of fixations on subtitle area increased. © 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10494820.2018.1517096
dc.identifier.endpage106en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-4820
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85053352133
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage95en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1517096
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000510812100008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge info@tandf.co.uken_US
dc.relation.ispartofInteractive Learning Environmentsen_US
dc.relation.journalInteractive Learning Environmentsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleInvestigation of Non-Native Learners’ Informal Learning Processes From Cognitive-Load Theory Perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files