Publication:
Suggestions on the White Paint Decorated Ware Tradition of the Samsun Region and Its Spread in Light of New Evidence

dc.authorwosidTürker, Atila/Q-1718-2015
dc.authorwosidTürker, Atila/Q-1718-2015
dc.contributor.authorTurker, Atila
dc.contributor.authorTiril-Ozbilgin, Cahide Gizem
dc.contributor.authorIDTürker, Atila/0000-0003-3893-4135
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:10:39Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Turker, Atila] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Dept Protohist & Near Eastern Archaeol, Kurupelit Campus, Samsun, Turkiye; [Tiril-Ozbilgin, Cahide Gizem] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Inst Grad Studies, Dept Archaeol, Kurupelit Campus, Samsun, Turkiyeen_US
dc.descriptionTürker, Atila/0000-0003-3893-4135;en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study discusses the white paint decorated pottery found during the surveys in the Samsun Region and the excavations at Dombalaktepe. This group of finds indicates the existence of a tradition of paint decoration that is not limited to the region but is widespread in the central and western half of Anatolia. In this article the origin, decoration types, chronology and distribution of this tradition are analyzed. The material studied was classified according to vessel and decoration types and compared with its parallels. Although the findings suggest that the origin of the white painted pottery tradition can be traced back to the Neolithic cultures of Southwestern Europe and Continental Greece, the decoration of vessels with linear lines has been observed to be dominant starting from the Anatolian coasts and has actually formed its own tradition. There is no continuity between the emergence of this tradition and the Neolithic, and the material characteristics have changed completely. Although some references indicate that the beginning of white painted pottery in Anatolia can be traced back to the Early Chalcolithic period, it continued to exist distinctly from the Middle Chalcolithic period until the end of the Early Bronze II period. Its distribution was not widespread throughout Anatolia, but clustered in certain regions. After the coastal and Inner Aegean regions, it reached the Central Taurus and North-Central Anatolia via two different routes. The motivation for this may have been the search for new sources of raw materials, especially copper deposits. We do not know whether the tradition was carried by a particular community particular community carried the tradition or whether it was a fashion reflecting the taste of the period. However, it is noteworthy that white painted ceramics are not found in Thrace, Eastern Marmara and Central Anatolia, and this may be due to the presence of different communities dominating these regions! At least, the absence fact that of any examples are found at least in Eastern Anatolia allows us to see the range and limits boundaries of its distribution. The white painted pottery tradition did not make use of the rich colours and varied decorations of the preceding Neolithic Age, preferring monochrome decorations with simpler motifs. Therefore, no special skills were required in the procurement and application of paint, and pottery was probably not a specialised occupation. We can understand that the community carrying the tradition did not prioritise preferences and aesthetic values, as evidenced by the lack of substantial changes in painted decoration over this period spanning approximately 3000 (between around 5500-2500 BC) years, during which the repertoire of colours narrowed. Within this framework, the sample of about 50 sherds found during the excavation at Dombalaktepe, the typology of the white painted ceramics and the calibrated radiocarbon data allow us to make a speculative approach to the meaning of the spread of this tradition in Anatolia.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTurkish Historical Society [TP4-1549]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe evaluation process of the Dombalaktepe excavation findings was sup-ported by the Turkish Historical Society (TTK Project No: TP4-1549) . Rainer M. Czichon, Hacer Sancaktar and Nazan UEnan shared the data from unpub-lished material for our study. We sincerely thank the relevant institution for per-mission and our colleagues for their support.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexArts & Humanities Citation Index
dc.identifier.endpage77en_US
dc.identifier.issn1301-7667
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage51en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/41868
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001459343300003
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherMersin Univ Publ Res Center Cilician Archaeologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOlbaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnatoliaen_US
dc.subjectBlack Seaen_US
dc.subjectSamsun Archaeologyen_US
dc.subjectDombalaktepeen_US
dc.subjectChalcolithic and Early Bronze Ageen_US
dc.subjectWhite Paint Decorated Wareen_US
dc.titleSuggestions on the White Paint Decorated Ware Tradition of the Samsun Region and Its Spread in Light of New Evidenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files