Publication:
Integration of Spatial and Fractal Analysis for Evaluating Urban Green Areas

dc.authorscopusid60015865700
dc.authorscopusid57198791430
dc.authorscopusid54412893200
dc.authorwosidUyar, Azize/Aad-1798-2022
dc.authorwosidOzturk, Derya/J-5461-2015
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Ipek
dc.contributor.authorUyar, Azize
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Derya
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:44:13Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Yilmaz, Ipek; Uyar, Azize; Ozturk, Derya] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, TR-55139 Samsun, Turkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractAccurate assessment of urban green areas is essential for enhancing livability and guiding sustainable urban planning. This study investigates green space distribution in Samsun, Turkey, by integrating spatial and fractal analyses. Green areas in 77 neighborhoods across the Atakum, Ilkadim, and Canik districts were identified using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) derived from Sentinel-2A/2B imagery (July-October 2023). To extract green areas, both Otsu's automatic and manual thresholding methods were applied. Manual thresholding demonstrated higher classification accuracy in heterogeneous urban contexts, based on spectral discrimination index and confusion matrix evaluation. Spatial assessment employed three indicators: Per Capita Green Space (PCGS), Urban Green Space Index (UGSI), and Urban Green Density Index (UGDI). Fractal dimension and lacunarity index were calculated using the box-counting and gliding box methods, respectively, to assess morphological structure. To synthesize these indicators, both equal-weighted overlay and principal component analysis (PCA) were applied. PCA-based aggregation (65.8% of total variance explained by the first component) was adopted to compute the urban green area service level (UGASL). UGASL scores were classified into five levels: very high, high, medium, low, and very low. In Atakum, 36.8% of neighborhoods were medium, 31.6% low, and 31.6% very low. In Ilkadim, 6.7% were high, 20% medium, 13.3% low, and 60% very low. In Canik, 7.7% were very high, 7.7% high, 30.8% medium, 15.4% low, and 38.4% very low. The study highlights intra-urban disparities and demonstrates that combining spatial and fractal metrics via PCA provides a robust, scalable framework for equitable and sustainable green infrastructure planning.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10661-025-14439-y
dc.identifier.issn0167-6369
dc.identifier.issn1573-2959
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.pmid40773045
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105012752060
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14439-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/38894
dc.identifier.volume197en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001545757300002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessmenten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectUrban Green Area Service Levelen_US
dc.subjectNDVIen_US
dc.subjectFractal Analysisen_US
dc.subjectSpatial Analysisen_US
dc.subjectPCAen_US
dc.subjectUrban Sustainabilityen_US
dc.titleIntegration of Spatial and Fractal Analysis for Evaluating Urban Green Areasen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files