Publication:
Pain Management in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence

dc.authorwosidDemir, Asli/A-8045-2016
dc.authorwosidDost, Burhan/Aas-4788-2020
dc.authorwosidAydın, Muhammed Enes/Glr-0946-2022
dc.authorwosidAykut, Aslihan/Hjp-0224-2023
dc.authorwosidDe Cassai, Alessandro/Abf-8590-2020
dc.authorwosidTurunc, Esra/Jwa-2584-2024
dc.contributor.authorDost, Burhan
dc.contributor.authorTurunc, Esra
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Muhammed Enes
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorAykut, Aslihan
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Zeliha Asli
dc.contributor.authorDe Cassai, Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorIDNarayanan, Madan/0000-0002-1042-3395
dc.contributor.authorIDDe Cassai, Alessano/0000-0002-9773-1832
dc.contributor.authorIDTurunç, Esra/0000-0003-0159-7403
dc.contributor.authorIDDost, Burhan/0000-0002-4562-1172
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:32:09Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Dost, Burhan; Turunc, Esra; Kaya, Cengiz] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Samsun, Turkiye; [Aydin, Muhammed Enes] Ataturk Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Erzurum, Turkiye; [Aykut, Aslihan; Demir, Zeliha Asli] Hlth Sci Univ, Ankara Bilkent City Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Ankara, Turkiye; [Narayanan, Madan] Frimley Hlth NHS Fdn Trust, Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Surrey, England; [De Cassai, Alessandro] Univ Padua, Dept Med DIMED, Padua, Italy; [De Cassai, Alessandro] Univ Hosp Padua, Inst Anesthesia & Intens Care Unit, Padua, Italyen_US
dc.descriptionNarayanan, Madan/0000-0002-1042-3395; De Cassai, Alessano/0000-0002-9773-1832; Turunç, Esra/0000-0003-0159-7403; Dost, Burhan/0000-0002-4562-1172;en_US
dc.description.abstractCompared with conventional sternotomy, minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) is associated with significant advantages such as reduced tissue trauma, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stay. However, the management of postoperative pain caused by intercostal nerve injury, pleural irritation, and tissue retraction remains a major challenge. Despite the less invasive nature of MICS, patients often report experiencing pain similar to that experienced following conventional cardiac surgery, particularly during the acute postoperative period. Effective pain management is essential for optimizing recovery, reducing the consumption of opioids, and preventing the transition to chronic postsurgical pain. Regional anesthesia techniques play a key role in multimodal analgesia for MICS. Thoracic epidural analgesia exhibits strong analgesic efficacy; nevertheless, it remains underutilized owing to concerns regarding anticoagulation-related complications and hemodynamic instability. The thoracic paravertebral block is a safer alternative that provides comparable pain relief with fewer side effects. Similarly, ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks, such as serratus anterior, parasternal intercostal, interpectoral + pectoserratus, and erector spinae plane blocks, have gained popularity owing to their safety and feasibility; however, the effectiveness of these blocks varies according to the surgical approach and type of incision. Systemic analgesia is an integral component of multimodal pain management in MICS. Despite the efficacy of opioids, a shift toward opioid-sparing strategies has been observed given the significant adverse effects associated with the use of opioids. Intravenous adjuncts such as dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can reduce opioid consumption and improve postoperative pain control. Despite advances in pain management, a single approach that can provide comprehensive analgesia for MICS remains to be established. A multimodal strategy that combines systemic and regional techniques must be developed to optimize pain management and long-term outcomes.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40122-025-00739-1
dc.identifier.endpage930en_US
dc.identifier.issn2193-8237
dc.identifier.issn2193-651X
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid40272720
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage913en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-025-00739-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/44394
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001476478500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Int Publ Agen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPain and Therapyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnalgesiaen_US
dc.subjectCardiac Surgical Proceduresen_US
dc.subjectNerve Blocken_US
dc.subjectMinimally Invasive Surgeryen_US
dc.titlePain Management in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Review of Current Clinical Evidenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files