Publication: Global Patterns of the Species Richness and Distribution of Eriophyoid Mites: A Response to Li et al. 2023
| dc.authorscopusid | 12788753000 | |
| dc.authorscopusid | 35768502400 | |
| dc.authorwosid | Sullivan, Sebahat/G-9704-2018 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ozman-Sullivan, Sebahat K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sullivan, Gregory T. | |
| dc.contributor.authorID | Sullivan, Sebahat/0000-0001-5240-8110 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-11T01:09:23Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.department | Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi | en_US |
| dc.department-temp | [Ozman-Sullivan, Sebahat K.] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Plant Protect, Samsun, Turkiye; [Sullivan, Gregory T.] Univ Queensland, Sch Environm, Brisbane, Australia | en_US |
| dc.description | Sullivan, Sebahat/0000-0001-5240-8110 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Aim: The global distribution and diversity of mites, including the species rich and highly host plant-specific eriophyoid mites, are important questions in biogeography and biodiversity conservation. Here we critique the paper of Li et al. (2023) titled 'Global patterns and drivers of herbivorous eriophyoid mite species diversity'. Location: Global Taxon: Eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea) Methods: We assert that the data set utilized (less than 4,500 eriophyoid species) consisted of only the described extant species, not all extant species. We then provide evidence that the utilised data set represents only a small proportion of the likely global total of eriophyoid species and therefore provides a far from complete representation of their global distribution. Results: Most collections of extant eriophyoid mites have been conducted in temperate regions where most taxonomic specialists have been active, and not in the largely unstudied tropical regions which contain a very substantial majority of all plant diversity. Most undescribed eriophyoid diversity is therefore highly likely to be found in the tropics. This suggests that the global modelling analyses of Li et al. (2023) were very likely applied to a highly inaccurate data set.Main Conclusions: The actual global distribution and total number of eriophyoid mite species can only be more reliably estimated by systematic taxonomic studies that cover the entire global distribution of plant diversity, which implies a strong focus on the tropical regions. | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | No fieldwork was undertaken for this study, so no permits were required. Furthermore, no data were generated because this paper is a response to a paper published earlier in this journal. Open access publishing facilitated by The University of Queensland,; University of Queensland, as part of the Wiley - The University of Queensland agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | No fieldwork was undertaken for this study, so no permits were required. Furthermore, no data were generated because this paper is a response to a paper published earlier in this journal. Open access publishing facilitated by The University of Queensland, as part of the Wiley - The University of Queensland agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians. | en_US |
| dc.description.woscitationindex | Science Citation Index Expanded | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jbi.14713 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 60 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0305-0270 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1365-2699 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85173054508 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 57 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.14713 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/41697 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 51 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001071079000001 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Biogeography | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Diğer | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Biodiversity Estimation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Biodiversity Hotspots | en_US |
| dc.subject | Biodiversity Loss | en_US |
| dc.subject | Climate Change | en_US |
| dc.subject | Coextinction | en_US |
| dc.subject | Global Biodiversity | en_US |
| dc.subject | Host Specificity | en_US |
| dc.subject | Invertebrate Conservation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Undescribed Biodiversity | en_US |
| dc.title | Global Patterns of the Species Richness and Distribution of Eriophyoid Mites: A Response to Li et al. 2023 | en_US |
| dc.type | Editorial | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
