Publication:
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Plate Versus Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Distal Tibial Metaphyseal Fractures

dc.authorscopusid36515473000
dc.authorscopusid56146088000
dc.authorscopusid53981294400
dc.authorscopusid34879497100
dc.authorscopusid56638608700
dc.authorwosidGültaç, Emre/X-7232-2019
dc.authorwosidGürler, Deniz/O-9444-2014
dc.contributor.authorSay, Ferhat
dc.contributor.authorInkaya, Erkan
dc.contributor.authorGurler, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorBulbul, Murat
dc.contributor.authorGultac, Emre
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:43:30Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Say, Ferhat; Inkaya, Erkan; Gurler, Deniz; Bulbul, Murat; Gultac, Emre] Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Training & Res Hosp, Mugla, Turkey; [Say, Ferhat] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Samsun, Turkey; [Inkaya, Erkan; Gurler, Deniz] Samsun Training & Res Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Samsun, Turkey; [Bulbul, Murat] Medipol Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractTreatment was made by locked anatomic tibial plate with MIPO technique on 17 patients (Group1), closed intramedullary nailing on 18 patients (Group2). The cases were evaluated with the AFAS score. The median operation duration was 90(59-139)mins in Group1, 77.5(59-145)mins in Group2. The median union time was 15(11-20)weeks in Group1, 18(1222)weeks in Group2. The median AFAS score was 84(47-90) in Group1, 82(65-90) in Group2. The most common complication was infection in Group1 and malunion in Group2. Only the difference in operation time was found to be statistically significant between the two groups The clinical and functional results of both treatment methods were similar and effective. Malalignment should be kept in mind when treating with intramedullary nail; infection when treating with MIPO.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.endpage53en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-6462
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85105946145
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage49en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/38782
dc.identifier.volume86en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000617685400009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherActa Medica Belgicaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Orthopaedica Belgicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFractureen_US
dc.subjectDistal Tibiaen_US
dc.subjectIntramedullary Nailingen_US
dc.subjectMinimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesisen_US
dc.titleComparison of Minimally Invasive Plate Versus Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Distal Tibial Metaphyseal Fracturesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files