Publication:
Portfolio Assessment: Does It Really Give the Benefits That It Purports to Offer? Views of Early Childhood and First-Grade Teachers

dc.authorscopusid57006689100
dc.authorscopusid55090246300
dc.contributor.authorAlaçam, N.
dc.contributor.authorOlgan, R.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:39:56Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:39:56Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Alaçam] Nur, Department of Elementary Education, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey, Department of Elementary Education, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Ankara, Turkey; [Olgan] Refika, Department of Elementary Education, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractEarly childhood (n = 10) and first-grade teachers’ (n = 10) views concerning portfolio usage were investigated in the current research. After collecting the data, six themes were constituted regarding the teachers’ opinions about portfolio use concerning ‘portfolio conception’, ‘advantages, disadvantages and challenges of portfolios’, ‘the content of early childhood portfolio’, ‘teacher's role in the portfolio process’, ‘sharing the portfolio with parents’, and ‘transfer of portfolios from early childhood to first grade’. The findings indicated that participants had similar ideas regarding the conception and content of portfolios. According to the teachers, as well as advantages, there are also disadvantages and challenges in the portfolio process. Moreover, most of the participants described similar roles for children, parents, and teachers in the portfolio process. Although the teachers stated that in principle they knew how to communicate with parents concerning the use of portfolios, most of them mentioned that they employed different ways of communicating in practice due to different reasons. Additionally, both groups of teachers confirmed that early childhood portfolios are not sent to the first-grade teachers, but both groups stated that this would be beneficial if it were to be possible. © 2015 Taylor & Francis.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03004430.2015.1108970
dc.identifier.endpage1519en_US
dc.identifier.issn0300-4430
dc.identifier.issn1476-8275
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84950106143
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage1505en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1108970
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/13722
dc.identifier.volume186en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000381646200013
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge info@tandf.co.uken_US
dc.relation.ispartofEarly Child Development and Careen_US
dc.relation.journalEarly Child Development and Careen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectEarly Childhood Teachersen_US
dc.subjectFirst-Grade Teachersen_US
dc.subjectPortfoliosen_US
dc.titlePortfolio Assessment: Does It Really Give the Benefits That It Purports to Offer? Views of Early Childhood and First-Grade Teachersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files