Publication:
Evaluation of Microtensile Bond Strength of Different Fissure Sealants to Bovine Enamel

dc.authorscopusid14049332200
dc.authorscopusid35730744800
dc.authorscopusid26041093200
dc.authorscopusid14068418700
dc.contributor.authorŞen Tunç, E.S.
dc.contributor.authorBayrak, S.
dc.contributor.authorTüloğlu, N.
dc.contributor.authorErtaş, E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:28:02Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:28:02Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Şen Tunç] Emine, Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Bayrak] Şule, Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Tüloğlu] Nuray, Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Ertaş] Ertan, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a new fissure sealant and compare it with conventional sealants which are applied to enamel alone, and also with self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives. Methods: Enamel specimens were prepared and randomly distributed into three groups according to fissure sealant (Aegis, Helioseal F, Helioseal Clear). Each group was then subdivided according to adhesive system (Clearfil S3, Single Bond, no adhesive). A universal testing machine was used to measure μTBS, and data were analysed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests. Results: μTBS values for all Aegis subgroups were significantly lower than for comparable Helioseal F and Helioseal Clear subgroups (p < 0.05). No differences were observed in μTBS of Helioseal F and Helioseal Clear (p > 0.05). In the Helioseal Clear group, μTBS values for Single Bond were significantly higher than for Clearfil S3 (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the μTBS values of the adhesive subgroups in the Aegis or Helioseal F groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Sealant μTBS values may be affected by material content. The addition of an adhesive may improve μTBS values of sealant to enamel. © 2012 Australian Dental Association.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01639.x
dc.identifier.endpage84en_US
dc.identifier.issn0045-0421
dc.identifier.issn1834-7819
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22369562
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84857752070
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage79en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01639.x
dc.identifier.volume57en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000300830000013
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Dental Journalen_US
dc.relation.journalAustralian Dental Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdhesive Systemsen_US
dc.subjectAmorphous Calcium Phosphateen_US
dc.subjectBond Strengthen_US
dc.subjectFissure Sealantsen_US
dc.subjectPreventive Dentistryen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Microtensile Bond Strength of Different Fissure Sealants to Bovine Enamelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files