Publication:
Apically Extruded Debris During Root Canal Instrumentation With Reciproc Blue, Hyflex EDM, and XP-Endo Shaper Nickel-Titanium Files

dc.authorscopusid57191441826
dc.authorscopusid56348812200
dc.authorscopusid57193440556
dc.authorscopusid57193708883
dc.authorscopusid13007942300
dc.contributor.authorUslu, G.
dc.contributor.authorOzyurek, T.
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, K.
dc.contributor.authorGündoğar, M.
dc.contributor.authorPlotino, G.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:11:15Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:11:15Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Uslu] Gulşah, Dental Clinic, Private Practice, Canakkale, Canakkale, Turkey; [Ozyurek] Taha, Department of Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Yılmaz] Koray, Çorum Oral and Dental Health Centre, Corum, Corum, Turkey; [Gündoğar] Mustafa, Department of Endodontics, İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Beykoz, Turkey; [Plotino] Gianluca, Private Practice, Rome, TV, Italyen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the amount of apically extruded debris by Reciproc Blue (REC Blue; VDW, Munich, Germany), HyFlex EDM (HEDM; Coltene/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland), and XP-endo Shaper (XPS; FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) files during root canal preparation at body temperature. Methods: Sixty extracted single-rooted mandibular premolar human teeth were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n = 20). The canals were instrumented using 1 of the following instruments: REC Blue, HEDM, or XPS. Apically extruded debris during instrumentation was collected into preweighed Eppendorf tubes. All the procedures were performed at 35°C. The amount of extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the weight value of the tooth-free apparatus from the postpreparation weight value. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test at a 5% significance level. Results: All the instruments tested caused extrusion of some debris from the apical foramen. XPS extruded significantly less debris from the apex than REC Blue (P < .05). The difference among the HEDM group and the other groups was not significant (P > .05). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the amount of apically extruded debris registered for the different files tested was REC Blue > HEDM > XPS, with a statistical difference only between XPS and REC Blue. © 2018 American Association of Endodontistsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.018
dc.identifier.endpage859en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid29550013
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85043509206
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage856en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.018
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000431942400030
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Inc. usjcs@elsevier.comen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAgar Gel Modelen_US
dc.subjectApical Extrusionen_US
dc.subjectDebrisen_US
dc.subjectInstrumentsen_US
dc.subjectNickel-Titaniumen_US
dc.titleApically Extruded Debris During Root Canal Instrumentation With Reciproc Blue, Hyflex EDM, and XP-Endo Shaper Nickel-Titanium Filesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files