Publication:
The Use of Different Staining Methods in the Evaluation of Frozen-Thawed Cauda Epididymal Ram Sperm Morphology

dc.authorscopusid57562175700
dc.authorscopusid57561394900
dc.authorscopusid57221229402
dc.authorscopusid23396214300
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Cumali
dc.contributor.authorAkar, M.
dc.contributor.authorEsin, B.
dc.contributor.authorÇevi̇k, M.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:30:28Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Kaya] Cumali, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Akar] Melih, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Esin] Burcu, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Çevi̇k] Mesut, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractSperm morphology evaluation is an important parameter for determining the quality of semen and predicting fertility in rams. Different staining methods have been developed to detect the morphological status of sperm, but there is no optimized protocol, especially for animals yet. This study was designed to compare the results using SpermBlue®, Diff-Quick, and Coomassie Blue stain in the morphological evaluation of epididymal ram semen. In the study, samples collected from a Bafra ram (epididymal sperm/ram) known to have a good breeding history were diluted with Tris-based diluent and frozen. After thawing for each straw, three semen smears were made and stained with SpermBlue®, Diff-Quick, and Coomassie Blue. All morphological parameters were evaluated using a light microscope. 100 spermatozoa were examined randomly and classified according to their characteristics for each slide. In identifying morphological abnormalities, the staining protocols have compared amongst themselves, and no significant difference between Diff-Quick and SpermBlue® staining methods was observed. However, significant differences were observed in midpiece abnormalities when SpermBlue® and Coomassie-Blue staining methods were compared, while significant difference was found in total abnormality in SpermBlue® and Diff-Quick staining comparison (P <0.05). As a result, all staining methods evaluated can be easily optimized for laboratory conditions and used in the morphological analysis of ram semen. © 2022 Asociacion Peruana de Reprouduccion Animal. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.18548/aspe/0010.06
dc.identifier.endpage38en_US
dc.identifier.issn2223-9375
dc.identifier.issn2308-4928
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85145320048
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage33en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18548/aspe/0010.06
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/36941
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAsociacion Peruana de Reprouduccion Animalen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSpermovaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectEpididymal Semenen_US
dc.subjectMorphologyen_US
dc.subjectRamen_US
dc.subjectStaining Proceduresen_US
dc.titleThe Use of Different Staining Methods in the Evaluation of Frozen-Thawed Cauda Epididymal Ram Sperm Morphologyen_US
dc.title.alternativeUso de Diferentes Métodos de Tinción en la Evaluación de la Morfología del Espermática de la Cola del Epidídimo Congelado en Carneroen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files