Publication:
Ultrasound Guided Reduction of Intussusception with Saline and Comparison with Operative Treatment

dc.authorscopusid6701838215
dc.authorscopusid55257269700
dc.authorscopusid57205051163
dc.authorscopusid14059523200
dc.authorscopusid23666382700
dc.contributor.authorTander, B.
dc.contributor.authorBaskin, D.
dc.contributor.authorCandan, M.
dc.contributor.authorBaşak, M.
dc.contributor.authorBankoǧlu, M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:18:55Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:18:55Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Tander] Burak, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Sisli Etfal Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Baskin] Didem, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Sisli Etfal Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; [Candan] Mustafa, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Sisli Etfal Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; [Başak] Muzaffer, Department of Radiology, Sisli Etfal Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; [Bankoǧlu] Müjdat, Department of Radiology, Sisli Etfal Hospital, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Reduction of intussusception under ultrasound guidance by saline has become popular in recent years. However, methods, duration of the procedure and causes of failure are not defined. In this study, we reviewed the patients who underwent ultrasound (US) guided saline reduction and compared them with those who were previously managed by operative intervention. METHODS: Patients with severe peritonitis or perforation, those over 3 years or younger than 1 month were excluded. Saline was applied by anus. Entry of saline into the ileum was the main indicator for successful reduction. Dramatic improvement in the clinical findings was considered as an additional sign of successful reduction. No limit was imposed on duration of the procedure. RESULTS: Hydrostatic reduction was successful in 41 out of 51 patients with intussusception. In three patients with partial resolution, hydrostatic reduction was attempted later and total reduction was achieved. No perforation or other complications were seen. In ten cases withreduction failure, one had an ileal lymphoma and another one had a duplication cyst as lead points. CONCLUSION: US guided hydrostatic reduction for childhood ileocolic intussusception is safe and, painless, has a high success rate and avoids radiation exposure risk. Presence of ultrasonographic and clinical changes is the best indicator of a successful reduction. In some cases, a second attempt may be necessary for reduction.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage293en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid17978910
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-39749191933
dc.identifier.startpage288en_US
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000256795800005
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Association of Trauma and Emergency Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUlusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisien_US
dc.relation.journalUlusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectInvagination/Diagnosis/Therapyen_US
dc.subjectSaline Enema Reductionen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonographyen_US
dc.subjectUltrasound Guided Interventionen_US
dc.titleUltrasound Guided Reduction of Intussusception with Saline and Comparison with Operative Treatmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files