Publication:
The Evaluation of Bond Strength of a Composite and a Compomer to White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate With Two Different Bonding Systems

dc.authorscopusid14049332200
dc.authorscopusid57193538380
dc.authorscopusid35730744800
dc.authorscopusid24172371100
dc.contributor.authorŞen Tunç, E.S.
dc.contributor.authorSönmez, I.
dc.contributor.authorBayrak, Ş.
dc.contributor.authorEǧilmez, T.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:14:02Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:14:02Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Şen Tunç] Emine, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Sönmez] Işil Şaroǧlu, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Kirikkale Üniversitesi, Kirikkale, Turkey; [Bayrak] Şule, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Eǧilmez] Türkan, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of a resin composite and a polyacid modified composite or "compomer" to white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA) with two different bonding systems (total-etch one bottle and self-etch one step). Forty specimens of WMTA were prepared and divided into four groups. In group one, Single Bond (3M/ESPE, St Paul, MN) and Z250 (3M/ESPE) were placed over WMTA. In group two, Prompt L-Pop (3M Dental Products, St Paul, MN) and Z250 were applied. In group three, Single Bond was applied with Dyract AP (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany), and, in group four, Prompt L-Pop was applied with Dyract AP. The shear bond strength was measured, and the fractured surfaces were examined. The results of the shear bond strength tests were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance test. The results of this study have suggested that the total-etch one-bottle adhesive system mediated a stronger bond to WMTA for both the resin composite and the compomer investigated. The placement of composite (Z250) and compomer materials (Dyract AP), used with total-etch one-bottle adhesive (Single Bond), over WMTA as final restoration may be appropriate. © 2008 American Association of Endodontists.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.026
dc.identifier.endpage605en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18436044
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-43049160939
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage603en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.026
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000255375400022
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCompomeren_US
dc.subjectComposite Resinen_US
dc.subjectShear Bond Strengthen_US
dc.subjectWhite Mineral Trioxide Aggregateen_US
dc.titleThe Evaluation of Bond Strength of a Composite and a Compomer to White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate With Two Different Bonding Systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files