Publication:
Leakage Evaluation of Three Different Root Canal Obturation Techniques Using Electrochemical Evaluation and Dye Penetration Evaluation Methods

dc.authorscopusid22934205900
dc.authorscopusid8514094700
dc.authorscopusid23483332300
dc.contributor.authorInan, U.
dc.contributor.authorAydemir, H.
dc.contributor.authorTaşdemir, T.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:27:15Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:27:15Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Inan] Uǧur, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Aydemir] Hikmet, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Taşdemir] Tamer, Department of Endodontics, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Trabzon, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare the apical sealing ability of three different obturation techniques using an electrochemical evaluation and evaluating dye penetration. One hundred and thirty-two maxillary anterior teeth were randomly divided into six groups. There were 20 teeth in each group. The teeth were obturated as follows: Groups 1 and 4 with Thermafil, Groups 2 and 5 with System B, and Groups 3 and 6 with cold lateral condensation (CLC). The apical leakage in these groups was evaluated using an electrochemical method for Groups 1, 2, 3 and a dye penetration method for Groups 4, 5 and 6. In both methods, the lowest mean leakage values were observed for Thermafil and the highest were observed for the CLC groups. The difference between Thermafil and CLC was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In both groups, System B fillings showed moderate leakage and the difference was not significant with Thermafil and CLC groups. © 2007 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2007 Australian Society of Endodontology.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00050.x
dc.identifier.endpage22en_US
dc.identifier.issn1329-1947
dc.identifier.issn1747-4477
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid17461836
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-34447104077
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage18en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00050.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/3965
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Endodontic Journalen_US
dc.relation.journalAustralian Endodontic Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectApical Leakageen_US
dc.subjectDye Penetrationen_US
dc.subjectElectrochemical Evaluationen_US
dc.subjectRoot Canal Obturationen_US
dc.titleLeakage Evaluation of Three Different Root Canal Obturation Techniques Using Electrochemical Evaluation and Dye Penetration Evaluation Methodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files