Publication:
Inaccuracy of Home Sphygmomanometers: A Perspective From Clinical Practice

dc.authorscopusid7004571672
dc.authorscopusid24402547900
dc.authorscopusid35271904500
dc.authorscopusid54902636400
dc.contributor.authorAkpolat, T.
dc.contributor.authorAydogdu, T.
dc.contributor.authorErdem, E.
dc.contributor.authorKarataş, A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:39:49Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:39:49Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Akpolat] Tekin, Department of Nephrology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Aydogdu] Türkan, Department of Nephrology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Erdem] Emre, Department of Nephrology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Karataş] Ahmet, Department of Nephrology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Home blood pressure monitoring requires a precise blood pressure measurement technique and an accurate sphygmomanometer. The oscillometric sphygmomanometers have some drawbacks including inaccuracy. The aims of this study were to assess the inaccuracy of home sphygmomanometers using a method first proposed in 2009 and to compare validated devices with other devices. Materials and methods: Three hundred and eighty-two home sphygmomanometers that had been brought by individuals to the University Hospital were included in this study. This method has three stages (general evaluation, quick screening, final assessment) and sequential measurement of blood pressure is used for assessment. The devices were categorized into two groups for comparisons: validated and 'others'. Results: One hundred and fourteen (30%) of the 382 devices were validated. Final assessment showed 91 (24%) of the 382 devices to be inaccurate. Inaccuracy among the 'others' and wrist devices were more common than for the validated and upper arm devices (P<0.0001 for both comparisons). The categorization of upper arm devices into validated and 'others' showed that the validated devices were more accurate than the 'others' (94 vs. 79%) (P=0.002). The frequency of inaccurate and very inaccurate devices was 3% (three of 114) and 4% (four of 114) for the validated devices, respectively. Conclusion: Validated and upper arm devices were more accurate than the 'others' and wrist devices. Validation did not guarantee individual accuracy. Active involvement of hypertension centers is required to improve the quality and reliability of home blood pressure monitoring. © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MBP.0b013e328348ca52
dc.identifier.endpage171en_US
dc.identifier.issn1359-5237
dc.identifier.issn1473-5725
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21928543
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79960843535
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage168en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0b013e328348ca52
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000292637400002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBlood Pressure Monitoringen_US
dc.relation.journalBlood Pressure Monitoringen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAccuracyen_US
dc.subjectAutomateden_US
dc.subjectHome Sphygmomanometersen_US
dc.subjectInaccuracyen_US
dc.subjectOscillometricen_US
dc.subjectUpper Armen_US
dc.subjectValidationen_US
dc.subjectWristen_US
dc.titleInaccuracy of Home Sphygmomanometers: A Perspective From Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files