Publication:
Second-Generation Sustainability: Application of the Distributed Activation Energy Model to the Pyrolysis of Locally Sourced Biomass-Coal Blends for Use in Co-Firing Scenarios

dc.authorscopusid23667181100
dc.authorscopusid7003728792
dc.contributor.authorGoldfarb, J.L.
dc.contributor.authorCeylan, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:41:37Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:41:37Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Goldfarb] Jillian L., Boston University College of Engineering, Boston, MA, United States; [Ceylan] Selim, Department of Chemical Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract While first generation biofuels paved the way for a vision of a renewable energy future, their competition for arable land limited widespread applicability. Second generation fuels, made from a variety of carbonaceous wastes, are considerably more "sustainable" in a land competition sense, but require a higher degree of processing to extract energy. Here we extend the idea of second-generation sustainability by investigating blends of coal and biomasses found within 20 miles of coal-fired power stations in the Northeast United States for use in co-firing scenarios that would limit long-range transport of biomass. A commercial high volatile bituminous Pennsylvanian coal was blended at 90, 80, and 50 wt% with one of three biomasses: feed corn stover from a local farm, brewer's spent grains from Redhook Brewery, or cocoa shells from the Lindt chocolate factory. The Distributed Activation Energy Model was applied to analyze the pyrolysis kinetics of the solid fuels and blends, yielding activation energies as a function of mass fraction conversion ranging from 304 to 522 kJ/mol for coal, 164 to 304 kJ/mol for the biomasses, and 218 to 530 kJ/mol for the coal-biomass blends. Overall, the peak reaction rates and temperatures for the primarily biomass decomposition stages were linearly correlated with the percent biomass in the blend. Such an additive scheme did not represent the blends' kinetics, instead over-predicting the activation energies. Synergy was noted between the fuels, in that the biomass does appear to be promoting the devolatilization of the coal at lower temperatures. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.fuel.2015.07.071
dc.identifier.endpage308en_US
dc.identifier.issn0016-2361
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84938904099
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage297en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.07.071
dc.identifier.volume160en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000360710600034
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofFuelen_US
dc.relation.journalFuelen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectActivation Energyen_US
dc.subjectCoal-Biomass Blenden_US
dc.subjectDistributed Activation Energy Modelen_US
dc.subjectPyrolysisen_US
dc.subjectSynergismen_US
dc.titleSecond-Generation Sustainability: Application of the Distributed Activation Energy Model to the Pyrolysis of Locally Sourced Biomass-Coal Blends for Use in Co-Firing Scenariosen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files