Publication:
Campylobacter in Wild Birds: Is It an Animal and Public Health Concern

dc.authorscopusid57465135200
dc.authorscopusid6507512220
dc.authorwosidGulhan, Timur/Lha-4156-2024
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Nejash A.
dc.contributor.authorGulhan, Timur
dc.contributor.authorIDGulhan, Timur/0000-0003-4798-1427
dc.contributor.authorIDAhmed, Nejash A/0000-0002-8461-4434
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:13:21Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Ahmed, Nejash A.; Gulhan, Timur] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Vet Microbiol, Fac Vet Med, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionGulhan, Timur/0000-0003-4798-1427; Ahmed, Nejash A/0000-0002-8461-4434en_US
dc.description.abstractCampylobacteriosis continues to be one of the leading causes of foodborne bacterial zoonotic infections worldwide. Despite its public health importance, the status of this disease in wild birds and the possibility of transmission from wild birds to domestic animals and humans have not been clearly elucidated yet. This article reviews the available literature with the aim of making a comprehensive manuscript on this disease status in wild birds and the possibility of interspecies transmission. Campylobacter has been isolated from various species of wild birds worldwide, with C. jejuni being the most commonly isolated species. The prevalence of Campylobacter in wild birds may vary depending on several factors like geographical location, season, the bird's health status, bird species, sample type, the method used, and ecological factors. Molecular studies over the past two to three decades have characterized Campylobacter strains isolated from wild birds and have come up with results that fall into two categories. The first are those that report overlapping strains among human, domestic animal, and wild bird isolates. The results of the studies under this category emphasize that wild birds carry strains of Campylobacter, which are indistinguishable from domestic animals and humans and are therefore an important public and animal health concern. In contrast, the studies under the second category highlight significant differences in Campylobacter population structure among these hosts. Despite the controversiality and the inadequacy of current research to draw a full conclusion, the role of wild birds in the epidemiology of Campylobacter should not be undermined as drug-resistant strains, especially resistance to tetracycline and fluoroquinolones, are increasingly documented. In addition, source attribution studies have linked human cases of Campylobacter infections to wild birds. Therefore, the role of wild birds in the epidemiology of Campylobacter infection should not be neglected. However, in order to determine disease status in wild birds and the precise role of wild birds in domestic animals and human health, detail-oriented epidemiological investigations characterizing the genetic relatedness of isolates from the respective species and environment through one health approach are warranted.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fmicb.2021.812591
dc.identifier.issn1664-302X
dc.identifier.pmid35222311
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85125189955
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.812591
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/42094
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000761050400001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SAen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Microbiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCampylobacteren_US
dc.subjectPublic Healthen_US
dc.subjectWild Birdsen_US
dc.subjectAnimal Healthen_US
dc.subjectFoodborne Infectionsen_US
dc.titleCampylobacter in Wild Birds: Is It an Animal and Public Health Concernen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files