Publication:
Comparison of Alterations in the Surface Topographies of HyFlex CM and HyFlex EDM Nickel-Titanium Files After Root Canal Preparation: A Three-Dimensional Optical Profilometry Study

dc.authorscopusid57191441826
dc.authorscopusid56348812200
dc.authorscopusid57193440556
dc.contributor.authorUslu, G.
dc.contributor.authorOzyurek, T.
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, K.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:17:41Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:17:41Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Uslu] Gulşah, Department of Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Ozyurek] Taha, Department of Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Yılmaz] Koray, Çorum Oral and Dental Health Centre, Corum, Corum, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractAims The aims of the present study were to examine the surface topographies of intact HyFlex CM and HyFlex EDM nickel-titanium files and to compare alterations in the surface topographies of these files after root canal preparation of severely curved canals of molar teeth. Methods Eight HyFlex CM (25/.08) and 8 HyFlex EDM (25/.08) files were included in the present study. In total, 64 severely curved canals of molar teeth, with curvature angles ranging between 50° and 70°, were prepared with HyFlex CM and EDM (n = 32 in each group). Quantitative and qualitative analyses of the files' surface deformation were performed by using three-dimensional optical profilometry before and after root canal preparation. The data were analyzed with the Student t test at the 5% significant level by using SPSS 21.0 software. Results In the HyFlex EDM group, the qualitative evaluation revealed the presence of cracks and microcavities after use of the file for root canal preparation, whereas only minor surface deformation was observed in the HyFlex CM group. The average roughness, root mean square roughness, and peak to valley height values of the HyFlex EDM group were significantly higher than those of the HyFlex CM group before and after root canal preparation (P <.05). The surface roughness values were statistically significantly increased in the HyFlex CM group after root canal preparation (P <.05). In contrast, the increase in the HyFlex EDM group was not statistically significant (P >.5). Conclusions Within the limitations of the present study, the HyFlex CM files showed significantly higher surface alterations compared with the HyFlex EDM files after the preparation of severely curved root canals. © 2017 American Association of Endodontistsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2017.05.023
dc.identifier.endpage119en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid29032817
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85030705710
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage115en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.05.023
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000418878600019
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectHyFlex CMen_US
dc.subjectHyFlex EDMen_US
dc.subjectNiTien_US
dc.subjectProfilometryen_US
dc.subjectSurface Deformationen_US
dc.titleComparison of Alterations in the Surface Topographies of HyFlex CM and HyFlex EDM Nickel-Titanium Files After Root Canal Preparation: A Three-Dimensional Optical Profilometry Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files