Publication:
Clinical Practice in Vesicoureteral Reflux With Respect to EAU Guidelines: A Multicenter Study

dc.authorwosidDeger, Mutlu/U-3585-2018
dc.authorwosidSatar, Nihat/A-4759-2013
dc.authorwosidGülşen, Murat/Hjg-9700-2022
dc.authorwosidSekerci, Cagri/I-5566-2015
dc.authorwosidOnal, Bulent/C-2701-2014
dc.authorwosidDogan, Hasan/Abh-5513-2020
dc.authorwosidHajiyev, Parviz/Afh-8635-2022
dc.contributor.authorTokat, Eda
dc.contributor.authorGurocak, Serhat
dc.contributor.authorOzkan, Secil
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Hasan Serkan
dc.contributor.authorCitamak, Burak
dc.contributor.authorSatar, Nihat
dc.contributor.authorOzgur Tan, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorIDOnal, Bulent/0000-0003-0540-2693
dc.contributor.authorIDGülşen, Murat/0000-0001-5371-0960
dc.contributor.authorIDTan, Mustafa Ozgur/0000-0003-0943-3868
dc.contributor.authorIDÇıtamak, Burak/0000-0002-7341-8753
dc.contributor.authorIDBurgu, Berk/0000-0003-1546-1179
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:35:34Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Tokat, Eda] Univ Hlth Sci, Ankara Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Ankara, Turkey; [Gurocak, Serhat; Agras, Koray; Ozgur Tan, Mustafa] Gazi Univ, Dept Pediat Urol, Sch Med, Ankara, Turkey; [Ozkan, Secil] Gazi Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Sch Med, Ankara, Turkey; [Dogan, Hasan Serkan; Citamak, Burak; Tekgul, Serdar] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Pediat Urol, Sch Med, Ankara, Turkey; [Satar, Nihat; Izol, Volkan; Deger, Mutlu] Cukurova Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Adana, Turkey; [Sarikaya, Saban; Bostanci, Yakup; Gulsen, Murat] Samsun Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Samsun, Turkey; [Onal, Bulent; Altinay Kirli, Elif] Istanbul Univ, Dept Pediat Urol, Cerrahpasa Med Sch, Istanbul, Turkey; [Burgu, Berk; Soygur, Tarkan; Haciyev, Perviz] Ankara Univ, Dept Pediat Urol, Sch Med, Ankara, Turkey; [Karabulut, Bilge] Univ Hlth Sci, Ankara Child Hlth & Dis Hematol Oncol Trainig & R, Dept Pediat Urol, Ankara, Turkey; [Akbal, Cem] Acibadem Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey; [Akin Sekerci, Cagri] Marmara Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey; [Demirci, Deniz; Baydilli, Numan] Erciyes Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Kayseri, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionOnal, Bulent/0000-0003-0540-2693; Gülşen, Murat/0000-0001-5371-0960; Tan, Mustafa Ozgur/0000-0003-0943-3868; Çıtamak, Burak/0000-0002-7341-8753; Burgu, Berk/0000-0003-1546-1179;en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose We designed a multicenter, retrospective study to investigate the current trends in initial management of reflux with respect to European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines in Urology clinics of our country. Materials and methods The study group consisted of 1988 renal units (RU) of 1345 patients treated surgically due to vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) (between years 2003 and 2017) in nine different institutions. Patients were divided into two groups according to time of initial treatment and also grouped according to risk factors by "EAU guidelines on VUR." Results In this series, 1426 RUs were treated initially conservatively and 562 RUs were initially treated with surgery. In initially surgically treated group, success rates of surgery decreased significantly in low and moderate risk groups after 2013 (P = .046, P = .0001, respectively), while success rates were not significantly different in high risk group (P = .46). While 26.6% of patients in low risk group were initially surgically treated before 2013, this rate has increased to 34.6% after 2013, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .096). However, performing surgery as the initial treatment approach increased significantly in both moderate and high risk groups (P = .000 and P = .0001, respectively) after 2013. Overall success rates of endoscopic treatments and ureteroneocystostomy (UNC) operations were 65% and 92.9% before 2013 and 60% and 78.5% after 2013, respectively. Thus, the overall success rate for surgery was 72.6%. There was significant difference between success rates of UNC operations before and after 2013 (P = .000), while the difference was not significant in the injection group (P = .076). Conclusion Current trends in management of reflux in our country do not yet follow the EAU guidelines on VUR in low and moderate risk groups despite these reliable and accepted guidelines were expected to influence our daily approach.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ijcp.14339
dc.identifier.issn1368-5031
dc.identifier.issn1742-1241
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33966353
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14339
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/44733
dc.identifier.volume75en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000654881200001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleClinical Practice in Vesicoureteral Reflux With Respect to EAU Guidelines: A Multicenter Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files