Publication: A Comparative Study of Ozonation, Iron Coated Zeolite Catalyzed Ozonation and Granular Activated Carbon Catalyzed Ozonation of Humic Acid
| dc.authorscopusid | 37031009100 | |
| dc.authorscopusid | 9239686500 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gümüş, D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Akbal, F. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-21T13:19:54Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-06-21T13:19:54Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.department | Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi | en_US |
| dc.department-temp | [Gümüş] Dilek, Directorate of Construction & Technical Works, Sinop Üniversitesi, Sinop, Turkey; [Akbal] Feryal, Environmental Engineering Department, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This study compares ozonation (O<inf>3</inf>), iron coated zeolite catalyzed ozonation (ICZ–O<inf>3</inf>) and granular activated carbon catalyzed ozonation (GAC–O<inf>3</inf>) for removal of humic acid from an aqueous solution. The results were evaluated by the removal of DOC that specifies organic matter, UV<inf>254</inf>absorbance, SUVA (Specific Ultraviolet Absorbance at 254 nm) and absorbance at 436 nm. When ozonation was used alone, DOC removal was 21.4% at an ozone concentration of 10 mg/L, pH 6.50 and oxidation time of 60 min. The results showed that the use of ICZ or GAC as a catalyst increased the decomposition of humic acid compared to ozonation alone. DOC removal efficiencies were 62% and 48.1% at pH 6.5, at a catalyst loading of 0.75 g/L, and oxidation time of 60 min for ICZ and GAC, respectively. The oxidation experiments were also carried out using <100 kDa and <50 kDa molecular size fractions of humic acid in the presence of ICZ or GAC. Catalytic ozonation also yielded better DOC and UV<inf>254</inf>reduction in both <50 kDa and <100 kDa fractions of HA compared to ozonation. © 2017 Elsevier Ltd | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.106 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 231 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0045-6535 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1879-1298 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 28171838 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85011623944 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 218 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.106 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 174 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000397076000025 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Chemosphere | en_US |
| dc.relation.journal | Chemosphere | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Catalytic Ozonation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Granular Activated Carbon | en_US |
| dc.subject | Humic Acid | en_US |
| dc.subject | Iron Coated Zeolite | en_US |
| dc.subject | Ozone | en_US |
| dc.title | A Comparative Study of Ozonation, Iron Coated Zeolite Catalyzed Ozonation and Granular Activated Carbon Catalyzed Ozonation of Humic Acid | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
