Publication:
Phonatory Aerodynamics of Reading: Effects of Age and Sex

dc.authorscopusid57038873600
dc.authorscopusid57200229971
dc.authorscopusid57200224486
dc.authorscopusid59907595100
dc.authorscopusid8641800800
dc.contributor.authorEsen-Aydinli, F.E.
dc.contributor.authorKarahan Tiğrak, T.
dc.contributor.authorİncebay, Ö.
dc.contributor.authorSezin, K.
dc.contributor.authorÖzcebe, E.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T00:35:37Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Esen-Aydinli] Fatma, Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Karahan Tiğrak] Tuğçe, Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey; [İncebay] Onal, Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Turkey; [Sezin] Korhan, Department of Audiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Özcebe] Esra, Department of Audiology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The main purpose of this study is to explore phonatory aerodynamic differences during reading based on age and sex. Methods: Normophonic Turkish speaking adults, identified using the GRBAS and Voice Handicap Index-10, were divided into three age categories: 18-39 years (n = 54), 40-59 years (n = 47), and 60 years and older (n = 32). Aerodynamic analysis was performed using the KayPentax Phonatory Aerodynamic System Model 6600, “Running Speech” protocol. Participants were instructed to read a standard reading passage. Parameters analyzed included the number of inspirations, phonation time, expiratory airflow duration, inspiratory airflow duration, and mean phonatory airflow during voicing. Mann-Whitney U tests were used for sex comparisons, while Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for age group comparisons, with Bonferroni corrections applied to both analyses. Accordingly, Brown-Forsythe test was used for searching sex and age differences. Results: Significant differences were observed in parameters of number of inspiration, expiratory airflow duration, and inspiratory airflow duration across age groups. Reading time and expiratory airflow duration increased with age, while inspiratory airflow duration was higher in the older age group compared to the middle and younger age groups. Mean phonatory airflow was the only parameter that varied by sex. Conclusions: The findings suggest that respiratory-laryngeal compensations help maintain stable airflow values throughout aging. In future studies, spontaneous speech may provide more ecologically valid results concerning phonatory aerodynamics. © 2025 The Voice Foundationen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.04.033
dc.identifier.issn0892-1997
dc.identifier.issn1873-4588
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105005781867
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.04.033
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/37691
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Voiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAerodynamics—Phonatory—Connected Speech—Voiceen_US
dc.titlePhonatory Aerodynamics of Reading: Effects of Age and Sexen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files