Publication:
Radiological, Clinical and Audiological Evaluation of Jugular Bulb–Vestibular Aqueduct Dehiscence

dc.authorscopusid55561168300
dc.authorscopusid23093729400
dc.authorscopusid17344191300
dc.authorscopusid16508006000
dc.contributor.authorTanrivermiş Sayit, A.
dc.contributor.authorElmali, M.
dc.contributor.authorKemal, O.
dc.contributor.authorTerzi, Y.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:27:19Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:27:19Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Tanrivermiş Sayit] Asli, Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Elmali] Muzaffer, Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Kemal] Özgür, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Terzi] Yüksel, Department of Statistics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of jugular bulb–vestibular aqueduct dehiscence (JBVAD) in patients undergoing temporal bone multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and assess the relationship between JBVAD and hearing loss with the findings of audiometry. Methods: About 1503 temporal bone MDCT scans were evaluated for the prevalence of JBVAD. Correlation of the imaging findings and audiometric data was performed. Patients were divided into two groups, those with and those without hearing loss, and were statistically compared. Results: Jugular bulb–vestibular aqueduct dehiscence was detected in 124 of the 1503 patients with a prevalence of 8.2%. MDCT images of 56 of the 124 patients were normal except for JBVAD (n = 38) and close proximity of the jugular bulb (JB) and vestibular aqueduct (VA) (n = 18). A total of 23 of 38 patients with JBVAD and 7 of 18 patients with close proximity of the JB and VA had hearing loss detected by audiometric evaluation. Conclusions: The most common hearing loss was detected as sensorineural hearing loss in patients with JBVAD. Also, median air and bone conduction and air bone gap values were found statistically higher in patients with hearing loss versus those without hearing loss. © 2017 Acta Oto-Laryngologica AB (Ltd).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00016489.2017.1360516
dc.identifier.endpage1225en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-6489
dc.identifier.issn1651-2251
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.pmid28799451
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85027378969
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage1221en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2017.1360516
dc.identifier.volume137en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000413849000001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd healthcare.enquiries@informa.comen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Oto-Laryngologicaen_US
dc.relation.journalActa Oto-Laryngologicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectComputed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectDehiscenceen_US
dc.subjectHearing Lossen_US
dc.subjectJugular Bulben_US
dc.subjectVestibular Aqueducten_US
dc.titleRadiological, Clinical and Audiological Evaluation of Jugular Bulb–Vestibular Aqueduct Dehiscenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files